We can't say anything concrete about how Ged Kearney voted on treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency
How Ged Kearney voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should treat the COVID-19 vaccination as a matter of urgency and ensure that Australians are being vaccinated as fast as possible, starting with essential workers such as staff working in hospitals and aged care facilities
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency” which Ged Kearney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ged Kearney on this policy.
| Division | Ged Kearney | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency” which Ged Kearney could have attended.
| Division | Ged Kearney | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Jun 2021, 6:52 PM – Representatives Covid-19 Disaster Payment (Funding Arrangements) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Quarantine and vaccine program |
absent | No |
17th Jun 2021, 11:27 AM – Representatives Social Services Legislation Amendment (Portability Extensions) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Age pension and pensioners stranded overseas |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Ged Kearney has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.