We can't say anything concrete about how Andrew Wilkie voted on a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability
How Andrew Wilkie voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should establish a Royal Commission to investigate and report on violence and abuse against people with disability in light of the the disproportionately high number of reports of abuse of Australians with a disability by people who are meant to care for them
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability” which Andrew Wilkie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew Wilkie on this policy.
| Division | Andrew Wilkie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2017, 5:35 PM – Representatives National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Quality and Safeguards Commission and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability” which Andrew Wilkie could have attended.
| Division | Andrew Wilkie | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Andrew Wilkie was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.