We can't say anything concrete about how Tony Smith voted on privatising certain government services
How Tony Smith voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give the private sector control over running and managing some of its services (such as public welfare, aged care and visa services) by either outsourcing or privatisation
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for privatising certain government services” which Tony Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tony Smith on this policy.
| Division | Tony Smith | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Oct 2016, 6:04 PM – Representatives National Cancer Screening Register Bill 2016 and another - Consideration in Detail - Privatisation |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for privatising certain government services” which Tony Smith could have attended.
| Division | Tony Smith | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Sep 2019, 1:14 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Streamlining Visa Processing) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Stop privatisation |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tony Smith was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.