We can't say anything concrete about how Tony Smith voted on a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability
How Tony Smith voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should establish a Royal Commission to investigate and report on violence and abuse against people with disability in light of the the disproportionately high number of reports of abuse of Australians with a disability by people who are meant to care for them
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability” which Tony Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tony Smith on this policy.
| Division | Tony Smith | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2017, 5:35 PM – Representatives National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Quality and Safeguards Commission and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability” which Tony Smith could have attended.
| Division | Tony Smith | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tony Smith was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.