We can't say anything concrete about how Tony Smith voted on reducing the corporate tax rate
How Tony Smith voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should reduce the corporate (or company) tax rate for all corporations (not just for small business)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing the corporate tax rate” which Tony Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tony Smith on this policy.
| Division | Tony Smith | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Feb 2018, 10:53 AM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Enterprise Tax Plan No. 2) Bill 2017 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
8th Feb 2018, 10:40 AM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Enterprise Tax Plan No. 2) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
27th Mar 2017, 4:00 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Enterprise Tax Plan) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
27th Mar 2017 – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Enterprise Tax Plan) Bill 2016 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing the corporate tax rate” which Tony Smith could have attended.
| Division | Tony Smith | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Feb 2018, 10:33 AM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Enterprise Tax Plan No. 2) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Don't read for a second time |
No | No |
27th Mar 2017 – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Enterprise Tax Plan) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Don't agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Tony Smith has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.