How Tony Smith voted compared to someone who agrees that the Federal Government should pass laws that ensure that people seeking asylum who are being held at offshore processing centres will be transferred to Australia for medical attention if more than one doctor say they need it, unless the Home Affairs Minister rejects it for security reasons

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for doctor-initiated medical transfers for asylum seekers” which Tony Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tony Smith on this policy.

Division Tony Smith Supporters vote

25th Jul 2019, 11:11 AM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Repairing Medical Transfers) Bill 2019 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

absent No

24th Jul 2019, 7:27 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Repairing Medical Transfers) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

absent No

12th Feb 2019, 6:11 PM – Representatives Home Affairs Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Bill 2018 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with the amendments

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for doctor-initiated medical transfers for asylum seekers” which Tony Smith could have attended.

Division Tony Smith Supporters vote

12th Feb 2019, 6:09 PM – Representatives Home Affairs Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Bill 2018 - Consideration of Senate Message - Amendment

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tony Smith was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.