We can't say anything concrete about how Andrew Hastie voted on increasing political transparency
How Andrew Hastie voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency requirements for political parties (for example, requiring full and prompt disclosure of any political donations on easy-to-search public websites)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Andrew Hastie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew Hastie on this policy.
| Division | Andrew Hastie | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Andrew Hastie could have attended.
| Division | Andrew Hastie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Oct 2021, 5:08 PM – Representatives Committees — Privileges and Members' Interests Committee; Reference |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Andrew Hastie was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.