Compare how Peter Andren and Mark Vaile voted on ending immigration detention on Nauru

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Nauru” which either Peter Andren or Mark Vaile could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Andren and Mark Vaile on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Peter Andren	Mark Vaile	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Nauru” which either Peter Andren or Mark Vaile could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Peter Andren	Mark Vaile	Supporters vote
10th Aug 2006, 12:57 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Read a third time	No	Yes	No
10th Aug 2006, 12:46 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Read a second time	No	Yes	No