We can't say anything concrete about how Andrew Gee voted on encouraging Australian-based industry
How Andrew Gee voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should encourage Australian-based industry and secure the jobs these industries create by, for example, providing incentives for companies to stay in Australia (note that there are specific policies in respect to the timber, dairy, shipping, coal, and film & TV industries, which means that votes specific to those subjects are not included here)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for encouraging Australian-based industry” which Andrew Gee could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew Gee on this policy.
| Division | Andrew Gee | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for encouraging Australian-based industry” which Andrew Gee could have attended.
| Division | Andrew Gee | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
29th Mar 2023, 12:02 PM – Representatives National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2023 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with the Senate amendments |
absent | Yes |
9th Mar 2023, 9:05 AM – Representatives National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Andrew Gee was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.