We can't say anything concrete about how Arch Bevis voted on same-sex marriage equality
How Arch Bevis voted compared to someone who agrees that the Federal Government should amend the Marriage Act 1961 so that same-sex couples can marry under Australian law
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for same-sex marriage equality” which Arch Bevis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Arch Bevis on this policy.
| Division | Arch Bevis | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for same-sex marriage equality” which Arch Bevis could have attended.
| Division | Arch Bevis | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Sep 2008, 10:55 AM – Representatives Same-Sex Relationships (Equal Treatment in Commonwealth Laws — General Law Reform) Bill 2008 - Second Reading |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Arch Bevis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.