We can't say anything concrete about how Andrew Laming voted on ending illegal logging
How Andrew Laming voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation to end illegal logging and prevent the importation of timber that has been illegally harvested.
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending illegal logging” which Andrew Laming could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew Laming on this policy.
| Division | Andrew Laming | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Aug 2012, 4:30 PM – Representatives Illegal Logging Prohibition Bill 2011 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending illegal logging” which Andrew Laming could have attended.
| Division | Andrew Laming | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Andrew Laming was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.