Compare how Andrew Southcott and Jamie Briggs voted on making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use” which either Andrew Southcott or Jamie Briggs could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew Southcott and Jamie Briggs on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Andrew Southcott	Jamie Briggs	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use” which either Andrew Southcott or Jamie Briggs could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Andrew Southcott	Jamie Briggs	Supporters vote
28th Nov 2012, 8:50 PM – Representatives Water Amendment (Water for the Environment Special Account) Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Opposition amendment	Yes	Yes	Yes
28th Nov 2012, 8:41 PM – Representatives Water Amendment (Water for the Environment Special Account) Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - 450 Gigalitres	No	No	No