We can't say anything concrete about how Ross Vasta voted on increasing support for rural and regional Australia
How Ross Vasta voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase its funding for initiatives that support rural and regional communities
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing support for rural and regional Australia” which Ross Vasta could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ross Vasta on this policy.
Division | Ross Vasta | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing support for rural and regional Australia” which Ross Vasta could have attended.
Division | Ross Vasta | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
4th Jun 2024, 5:19 PM – Representatives Net Zero Economy Authority Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Community engagements and plans; developer rating scheme |
absent | Yes |
16th Feb 2023, 9:05 AM – Representatives National Housing Supply and Affordability Council Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Regional Australia and critical infrastructure |
absent | No |
15th Feb 2023, 6:26 PM – Representatives Housing Australia Future Fund Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Proportion of grants to regional, rural and remote Australia |
absent | No |
4th Aug 2022, 10:49 AM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Regional Australia |
No | Yes |
10th Jun 2020, 7:24 PM – Representatives National Skills Commissioner Bill 2020 - Consideration in Detail - Regional Australia |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Ross Vasta has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.