![Photo of Jason Clare](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10123.jpg)
We can't say anything concrete about how Jason Clare voted on Build to Rent (BTR)
How Jason Clare voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should address the rental crisis by supporting Build to Rent (BTR) with tax incentives, so as to encourage the development of more multi-apartment buildings where the apartments are rented out (usually through a single management entity) rather than sold
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Build to Rent (BTR)” which Jason Clare could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jason Clare on this policy.
Division | Jason Clare | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
27th Jun 2024, 10:25 AM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Responsible Buy Now Pay Later and Other Measures) Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Delete Schedule 1 |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Build to Rent (BTR)” which Jason Clare could have attended.
Division | Jason Clare | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
27th Jun 2024, 10:13 AM – Representatives Capital Works (Build to Rent Misuse Tax) Bill 2024 - Report from Federation Chamber - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
27th Jun 2024, 10:04 AM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Responsible Buy Now Pay Later and Other Measures) Bill 2024 - Report from Federation Chamber - Criticism of Government |
No | No |
27th Jun 2024, 9:56 AM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Responsible Buy Now Pay Later and Other Measures) Bill 2024 - Report from Federation Chamber - Criticism of Government |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jason Clare has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.