We can't say anything concrete about how Julian Leeser voted on increasing funding for legal aid
How Julian Leeser voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase funding for the legal assistance sector (Legal Aid, community legal centres, etc.)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Julian Leeser could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Julian Leeser on this policy.
| Division | Julian Leeser | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Julian Leeser could have attended.
| Division | Julian Leeser | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Sep 2018 – Representatives Family Law Amendment (Family Violence and Cross-Examination of Parties) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Access to legal representation |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Julian Leeser was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.