Compare how Steve Gibbons and Kelvin Thomson voted on ending illegal logging

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending illegal logging” which either Steve Gibbons or Kelvin Thomson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Steve Gibbons and Kelvin Thomson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Steve Gibbons	Kelvin Thomson	Supporters vote
20th Aug 2012, 4:30 PM – Representatives Illegal Logging Prohibition Bill 2011 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill	Yes	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending illegal logging” which either Steve Gibbons or Kelvin Thomson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Steve Gibbons	Kelvin Thomson	Supporters vote
no votes listed