Compare how Steve Gibbons and Danna Vale voted on restricting foreign ownership

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which either Steve Gibbons or Danna Vale could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Steve Gibbons and Danna Vale on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Steve Gibbons	Danna Vale	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which either Steve Gibbons or Danna Vale could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Steve Gibbons	Danna Vale	Supporters vote
18th Oct 2006, 12:09 PM – Representatives Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	No	Yes	No
18th Oct 2006, 11:21 AM – Representatives Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	No	Yes	No