Compare how Lisa Chesters and Pat Conaghan voted on net zero emissions by 2050
Lisa Chesters
Australian Labor Party Representative for Bendigo since September 2013
Pat Conaghan
National Party Representative for Cowper since May 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to achieving net zero emissions by 2050 as part of Australia's efforts to address climate change
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2050” which either Lisa Chesters or Pat Conaghan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lisa Chesters and Pat Conaghan on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2050” which either Lisa Chesters or Pat Conaghan could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Lisa Chesters | Pat Conaghan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
8th Sep 2022, 4:26 PM – Representatives Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate amendment |
Yes | No | Yes |
8th Sep 2022, 4:20 PM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate amendments |
Yes | No | Yes |