We can't say anything concrete about how David Feeney voted on decreasing ABC and SBS funding
How David Feeney voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should decrease funding for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and the Special Broadcasting Service (SBS)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing ABC and SBS funding” which David Feeney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Feeney on this policy.
| Division | David Feeney | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing ABC and SBS funding” which David Feeney could have attended.
| Division | David Feeney | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th May 2015, 8:27 PM – Representatives Communications Legislation Amendment (Sbs Advertising Flexibility and Other Measures) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree to bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
18th Jun 2013, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions - Public Broadcasting - Properly fund ABC and SBS |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
David Feeney has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.