Compare how David Feeney and Kate Lundy voted on offshore processing for people seeking asylum in Australia

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for offshore processing for people seeking asylum in Australia” which either David Feeney or Kate Lundy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Feeney and Kate Lundy on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	David Feeney	Kate Lundy	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for offshore processing for people seeking asylum in Australia” which either David Feeney or Kate Lundy could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	David Feeney	Kate Lundy	Supporters vote
25th Aug 2011 – Senate Motions - Immigration: MV Tampa - End offshore processing	No	No	No
25th Nov 2009, 4:05 PM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - Stop excising territory	No	No	No