Compare how Bridget Archer and Dan Repacholi voted on ending immigration detention on Nauru

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Nauru” which either Bridget Archer or Dan Repacholi could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bridget Archer and Dan Repacholi on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Bridget Archer	Dan Repacholi	Supporters vote
7th Feb 2023, 5:55 PM – Representatives Regulations and Determinations - Instrument of Designation of the Republic of Nauru as a Regional Processing Country	Yes	Yes	No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Nauru” which either Bridget Archer or Dan Repacholi could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Bridget Archer	Dan Repacholi	Supporters vote
no votes listed