We can't say anything concrete about how Robert McClelland voted on ending immigration detention on Manus Island
How Robert McClelland voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should close its Manus Regional Processing Centre and stop all Manus-based processing of people's claims for asylum
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Manus Island” which Robert McClelland could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Robert McClelland on this policy.
| Division | Robert McClelland | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Manus Island” which Robert McClelland could have attended.
| Division | Robert McClelland | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
27th Nov 2012, 8:18 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Unauthorised Maritime Arrivals and Other Measures) Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
Yes | No |
10th Aug 2006, 12:57 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | No |
10th Aug 2006, 12:46 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Robert McClelland has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.