We can't say anything concrete about how Daryl Melham voted on compensating victims of overseas terrorism since the September 11 attack
How Daryl Melham voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should extend compensation to all Australian victims of overseas terrorism since the 11 September 2001 attack, or to their next of kin
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for compensating victims of overseas terrorism since the September 11 attack” which Daryl Melham could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Daryl Melham on this policy.
| Division | Daryl Melham | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2012, 2:42 PM – Representatives Social Security Amendment (Supporting Australian Victims of Terrorism Overseas) Bill 2011 - Consideration in Detail - Compensate past victims |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for compensating victims of overseas terrorism since the September 11 attack” which Daryl Melham could have attended.
| Division | Daryl Melham | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
29th Nov 2012, 6:29 PM – Representatives Private Members' Business - Victims of Terrorism - Compensate victims since 10 September 2001 |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Daryl Melham was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.