We can't say anything concrete about how Mary Doyle voted on increasing support for rural and regional Australia
How Mary Doyle voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase its funding for initiatives that support rural and regional communities
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing support for rural and regional Australia” which Mary Doyle could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mary Doyle on this policy.
| Division | Mary Doyle | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing support for rural and regional Australia” which Mary Doyle could have attended.
| Division | Mary Doyle | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Jun 2024, 5:19 PM – Representatives Net Zero Economy Authority Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Community engagements and plans; developer rating scheme |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Mary Doyle has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.