Compare how Steve Georganas and Mike Symon voted on a carbon price
Steve Georganas
Australian Labor Party Representative for Adelaide since May 2019
Mike Symon
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Deakin November 2007 – September 2013
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce a carbon pricing mechanism
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a carbon price” which either Steve Georganas or Mike Symon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Steve Georganas and Mike Symon on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Steve Georganas | Mike Symon | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
11th Oct 2012, 9:06 AM – Representatives Clean Energy Amendment (International Emissions Trading and Other Measures) Bill 2012 - Second reading - Motion to abolish the carbon price |
No | No | No |
12th Oct 2011 – Representatives Clean Energy Bill 2011 and related bills - Third Reading - Read a third time |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
12th Oct 2011 – Representatives Clean Energy Bill 2011 and related bills - Consideration in Detail - Defer commencement of the carbon price |
No | No | No |
11th Oct 2011 – Representatives Clean Energy Bill 2011 and related bills - Second Reading - Read a second time |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a carbon price” which either Steve Georganas or Mike Symon could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".