How Kate Ellis voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should unify the Federal Circuit Court of Australia and the Family Court of Australia so that they are one court to be known as the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which Kate Ellis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kate Ellis on this policy.

Division Kate Ellis Supporters vote

27th Nov 2018, 5:23 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

absent Yes

27th Nov 2018, 5:14 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent Yes

27th Nov 2018, 5:03 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which Kate Ellis could have attended.

Division Kate Ellis Supporters vote
no votes listed

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kate Ellis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.