We can't say anything concrete about how Clive Palmer voted on increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace
How Clive Palmer voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases the powers and influence of trade unions in workplace relations
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace” which Clive Palmer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Clive Palmer on this policy.
| Division | Clive Palmer | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace” which Clive Palmer could have attended.
| Division | Clive Palmer | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Feb 2016, 10:39 AM – Representatives Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Bill 2013 [No. 2] and another - Third Reading - Pass the bills |
absent | No |
4th Feb 2016, 10:20 AM – Representatives Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Bill 2013 [No. 2] and another - Second Reading - Agree with the bills' main idea |
absent | No |
12th Dec 2013, 5:33 PM – Representatives Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Bill 2013 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Clive Palmer was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.