How John Faulkner voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should administer the paid parental leave scheme rather than employers

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for government administered paid parental leave” which John Faulkner could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Faulkner on this policy.

Division John Faulkner Supporters vote

17th Jun 2010, 12:09 PM – Senate Paid Parental Leave Bill 2010, Paid Parental Leave (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2010 - In Committee - Administration of payment

absent No

16th Jun 2010, 6:29 PM – Senate Paid Parental Leave Bill 2010, Paid Parental Leave (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2010 - In Committee - Administration of payment

absent No

16th Jun 2010, 6:20 PM – Senate Paid Parental Leave Bill 2010, Paid Parental Leave (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2010 - In Committee - Administration of Payment

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for government administered paid parental leave” which John Faulkner could have attended.

Division John Faulkner Supporters vote

14th Jun 2007, 9:45 AM – Senate Motions - Paid Maternity Leave - Government funded paid maternity leave

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case John Faulkner was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.