We can't say anything concrete about how Ian Campbell voted on increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker management
How Ian Campbell voted compared to someone who agrees that there should be more independent access to detention centres and more information provided about the management of asylum seekers under Australian government policy, including the interception of boats at sea
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker management” which Ian Campbell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ian Campbell on this policy.
| Division | Ian Campbell | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker management” which Ian Campbell could have attended.
| Division | Ian Campbell | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th May 2007, 10:17 AM – Senate Motions - Iraq - Information requested |
absent | Yes |
2nd Mar 2006, 11:37 AM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional References Committee - Refer |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ian Campbell was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.