Division Description Changes — Bills — Aged Care Bill 2024, Aged Care Legislation Amendment Bill 2024; Second Reading — 21st Nov 2024

Change	Division
senate vote 2024-11-21#2 Edited by mackay staff on 2024-11-24 12:34:29	Title Bills — Aged Care Bill 2024, Aged Care Legislation Amendment Bill 2024; Second Reading Aged Care Bill 2024, Aged Care Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Greens amendment Description ~~<p class="speaker">Jordon Steele-John</p>~~ <p>I move the second reading amendment as foreshadowed and circulated in my name:</p> ~~<p class="italic">At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:</p>~~ ~~<p class="italic">(a) notes that:</p>~~ <p class="italic">(i) the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety recommended that no person with disability under the age of 65 should remain living in residential aged care from 2025,</p> <p class="italic">(ii) while the Government accepted this recommendation, this Bill works in direct opposition to the recommendation by formalising a pathway to place people under 65 in aged care,</p> <p class="italic">(iii) there are 911 people aged under 65 in residential aged care who are NDIS participants who should be receiving the disability-specific supports they need to exit residential aged care; and</p> <p class="italic">(b) calls on the Government to implement the recommendation of the Royal Commission and ensure no disabled person under the age of 65 remains living in residential aged care".</p> ~~<p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>~~ ~~<p>The question is that the second reading amendment moved by Senator Steele-John be agreed to.</p>~~ ~~<p></p>~~ ~~<p></p>~~ The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2024-11-21.6.2) to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). The amendment was introduced by West Australian Senator [Jordon Steele-John](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/wa/jordon_steele-john) (Greens). ### Amendment text > At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate: > > (a) notes that: > >> (i) the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety recommended that no person with disability under the age of 65 should remain living in residential aged care from 2025, >> >> (ii) while the Government accepted this recommendation, this Bill works in direct opposition to the recommendation by formalising a pathway to place people under 65 in aged care, >> >> (iii) there are 911 people aged under 65 in residential aged care who are NDIS participants who should be receiving the disability-specific supports they need to exit residential aged care; and > > (b) calls on the Government to implement the recommendation of the Royal Commission and ensure no disabled person under the age of 65 remains living in residential aged care".

~~Jordon Steele-John~~
I move the second reading amendment as foreshadowed and circulated in my name:
~~At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:~~
~~(a) notes that:~~
(i) the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety recommended that no person with disability under the age of 65 should remain living in residential aged care from 2025,
(ii) while the Government accepted this recommendation, this Bill works in direct opposition to the recommendation by formalising a pathway to place people under 65 in aged care,
(iii) there are 911 people aged under 65 in residential aged care who are NDIS participants who should be receiving the disability-specific supports they need to exit residential aged care; and
(b) calls on the Government to implement the recommendation of the Royal Commission and ensure no disabled person under the age of 65 remains living in residential aged care".
~~Sue Lines~~
~~The question is that the second reading amendment moved by Senator Steele-John be agreed to.~~
~~~~
~~~~
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2024-11-21.6.2) to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). The amendment was introduced by West Australian Senator [Jordon Steele-John](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/wa/jordon_steele-john) (Greens).
### Amendment text
> *At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:*
>
> *(a) notes that:*
>
>> *(i) the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety recommended that no person with disability under the age of 65 should remain living in residential aged care from 2025,*
>>
>> *(ii) while the Government accepted this recommendation, this Bill works in direct opposition to the recommendation by formalising a pathway to place people under 65 in aged care,*
>>
>> *(iii) there are 911 people aged under 65 in residential aged care who are NDIS participants who should be receiving the disability-specific supports they need to exit residential aged care; and*
>
> *(b) calls on the Government to implement the recommendation of the Royal Commission and ensure no disabled person under the age of 65 remains living in residential aged care".*