Criminal Code Amendment (Deepfake Sexual Material) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Make an offence
Not passed by a small majority
No rebellions 46% attendance
Division last edited 1st Sep 2024 by mackay staff
The majority voted against an amendment introduced by West Australian Senator Michaelia Cash (Liberal), which means it failed.
Senator Cash explained that:
I'm offering in terms of the amendment—I understand it won't be supported, but by way of explanation—a way forward that avoids the drafting problems, risks and unintended consequences associated with the government's unusual drafting choices in this bill. It is an amendment that means simply clarifying that the existing aggravated offence—that means the definition of consent remains; we don't have the issues arising in terms of cross-examination—applies to deepfakes, as it was always intended to. This is an approach that preserves the advantages the Law Council spoke about but, as I said, also addresses the potential concerns that have been raised in relation to the Attorney-General's unusual drafting choices. It preserves the definition of consent but reduces the risk that a prosecution will fall over—this is always a risk when you're actually prosecuting something and you now need to prove the consent, because consent is an element of the offence—because a victim is reluctant to be cross-examined in a court. It is a better way to arrive at the destination that the government is aiming for. As I said, we get to the same destination. We would argue it is a better way to do it, and it addresses the unusual drafting choices but also the unintended consequences in terms of the risks that prosecutions will fall over because a victim is reluctant to be cross-examined in court.
(1) Schedule 1, page 3 (line 1) to page 9 (line 5), omit Schedule 1, substitute:
Schedule 1 — Amendments
Criminal Code Act 1995
1 Section 473.1 of the Criminal Code (at the end of the definition of material )
Add:
Note: See also section 473.6 (which deals with material that has been created or altered using digital technology).
2 Section 473.1 of the Criminal Code (definition of private sexual material ) (note)
Omit "Note", substitute "Note 1".
3 Section 473.1 of the Criminal Code (at the end of the definition of private sexual material )
Add:
Note 2: See also section 473.6 (which deals with material that has been created or altered using digital technology).
4 At the end of Division 473.1 of Part 10.6 of the Criminal Code
Add:
473.6 Material created or altered using digital technology
(1) To avoid doubt, the definition of material in section 473.1 includes material that has been created, or altered in any way, using technology.
Note: This includes images, videos or audio depicting a person that have been edited or entirely created using digital technology (including artificial intelligence), generating a realistic but false depiction of the person. Examples of such material are "deepfakes".
(2) For the purposes of the definition of private sexual material in section 473.1, in deciding whether a depiction covered by paragraph (a) or (b) of that definition is in circumstances that reasonable persons would regard as giving rise to an expectation of privacy, the following matters are irrelevant:
(a) whether the material mentioned in that paragraph:
(i) is in an unaltered form; or
(ii) has been created, or altered in any way, using technology;
(b) if the material mentioned in that paragraph has been created, or altered in any way, using technology—whether the person depicted in that material authorised, or was otherwise involved in, the creation or alteration of that material.
Note: For example, material depicting a person's (the victim's) face is publicly available. Another person uses technology to alter other material (the altered material) by superimposing the victim's face onto the altered material, such that the altered material appears to show the victim engaging in sexual activity. This depiction of the victim in the altered material may be in circumstances that reasonable persons would regard as giving rise to an expectation of privacy.
5 Application of amendments
The amendments made by this Schedule apply in relation to material that is transmitted, made available, published, distributed, advertised or promoted after the commencement of this Schedule, whether the material was created or altered before, on or after that commencement.
[material created or altered using technology]
Nobody rebelled against their party.
Party | Votes | |
---|---|---|
Australian Greens (91% turnout) | 0 Yes – 10 No | |
Penny Allman-Payne Queensland | No | |
Dorinda Cox WA | No | |
Mehreen Faruqi NSW | No | |
Sarah Hanson-Young SA | No | |
Steph Hodgins-May Victoria | No | |
Nick McKim Tasmania | No | |
David Shoebridge NSW | No | |
Jordon Steele-John WA | No | |
Larissa Waters Queensland | No | |
Peter Whish-Wilson Tasmania | No | |
Barbara Pocock SA | Absent | |
Australian Labor Party (83% turnout) | 0 Yes – 20 No | |
Tim Ayres NSW | No | |
Catryna Bilyk Tasmania | No | |
Carol Brown Tasmania | No | |
Anthony Chisholm Queensland | No | |
Raff Ciccone Victoria | No | |
Lisa Darmanin Victoria | No | |
Varun Ghosh WA | No | |
Nita Green Queensland | No | |
Karen Grogan SA | No | |
Jenny McAllister NSW | No | |
Malarndirri McCarthy NT | No | |
Deborah O'Neill NSW | No | |
Helen Polley Tasmania | No | |
Louise Pratt WA | No | |
Tony Sheldon NSW | No | |
Marielle Smith SA | No | |
Glenn Sterle WA | No | |
Jana Stewart Victoria | No | |
Jess Walsh Victoria | No | |
Murray Watt Queensland | No | |
Don Farrell SA | Absent | |
Katy Gallagher ACT | Absent | |
Anne Urquhart Tasmania | Absent | |
Penny Wong SA | Absent | |
Jacinta Nampijinpa Price NT Country Liberal Party | Yes | |
Andrew McLachlan SA Deputy President | Yes | |
David Pocock ACT Independent | Yes | |
Fatima Payman WA Independent | Absent | |
Lidia Thorpe Victoria Independent | Absent | |
Tammy Tyrrell Tasmania Independent | Absent | |
David Van Victoria Independent | Absent | |
Jacqui Lambie Tasmania Jacqui Lambie Network | Yes | |
Tammy Tyrrell Tasmania Jacqui Lambie Network | Yes | |
Liberal National Party (50% turnout) | 1 Yes – 0 No | |
James McGrath Queensland | Yes | |
Matthew Canavan Queensland | Absent | |
Liberal Party (83% turnout) | 19 Yes – 0 No | |
Wendy Askew Tasmania | Yes | |
Andrew Bragg NSW | Yes | |
Slade Brockman WA | Yes | |
Michaelia Cash WA | Yes | |
Claire Chandler Tasmania | Yes | |
Richard Colbeck Tasmania | Yes | |
Jonathon Duniam Tasmania | Yes | |
David Fawcett SA | Yes | |
Sarah Henderson Victoria | Yes | |
Hollie Hughes NSW | Yes | |
Jane Hume Victoria | Yes | |
Maria Kovacic NSW | Yes | |
Matt O'Sullivan WA | Yes | |
James Paterson Victoria | Yes | |
Gerard Rennick Queensland | Yes | |
Anne Ruston SA | Yes | |
Paul Scarr Queensland | Yes | |
Dave Sharma NSW | Yes | |
Dean Smith WA | Yes | |
Alex Antic SA | Absent | |
Simon Birmingham SA | Absent | |
Kerrynne Liddle SA | Absent | |
Linda Reynolds WA | Absent | |
National Party (75% turnout) | 3 Yes – 0 No | |
Ross Cadell NSW | Yes | |
Perin Davey NSW | Yes | |
Bridget McKenzie Victoria | Yes | |
Susan McDonald Queensland | Absent | |
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party (100% turnout) | 2 Yes – 0 No | |
Pauline Hanson Queensland | Yes | |
Malcolm Roberts Queensland | Yes | |
Sue Lines WA President | No | |
Ralph Babet Victoria United Australia Party | Absent | |
Totals (80% turnout) | 30 Yes – 31 No |
Turnout is the percentage of members eligible to vote that did vote.