All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2024-05-16#38
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2024-09-08 18:52:23
|
Title
Description
-
- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2024-05-16.240.1) "*that part 2 of schedule 4 stand as printed*". In other words, they voted to keep that part as it is. This motion was introduced in response to an amendment that:
- > *(1) Schedule 4, Part 2, page 55 (lines 1 to 18), to be opposed.*
- ### What is part 2 of schedule 4?
- According to the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2324a/24bd34):
> *Part 2 of Schedule 4 of the Bill repeals section 213A of the Native Title Act 1993. This section, ‘Assistance from Attorney General’, provides the statutory basis for the Native Title Respondents Scheme (NTRS) (also referred to as the Native Title Respondents Funding Scheme) and the associated Native Title Officer Funding Scheme (NTOFS) (‘the schemes’). Repealing this section (and the accompanying repeal of subsection94P, dealing with reports about breaches of the requirement to act in good faith by recipients of NTRS funds) has the effect of abolishing the schemes.*- > *Part 2 of Schedule 4 of the Bill repeals section 213A of the Native Title Act 1993. This section, ‘Assistance from Attorney General’, provides the statutory basis for the Native Title Respondents Scheme (NTRS) (also referred to as the Native Title Respondents Funding Scheme) and the associated Native Title Officer Funding Scheme (NTOFS) (‘the schemes’). Repealing this section (and the accompanying repeal of subsection94P, dealing with reports about breaches of the requirement to act in good faith by recipients of NTRS funds) has the effect of abolishing the schemes. [...]*
- >
- > *Abolishing the schemes was an election commitment by the ALP, and has been ALP policy for some time, having previously been a 2019 election commitment. After the 2022 election, their abolition was announced in the October 2022 budget as a budget saving (Budget October 2022–23 - Budget Paper 2, p. 48). The projected saving is $6.4 million over 4 years ($1.6 million/year) and $1.8 million a year ongoing.*
- >
- > *As rationale for abolition, the Attorney-General’s Second Reading Speech states: ‘Many significant questions of native title law have now been settled and the government considers that many current native title respondents, which are generally commercially viable or sound entities, would have the capacity to deal with native title matters as part of their ordinary business costs.’ As discussed below, this essentially repeats previous rationales for the scheme’s restriction by both Coalition and ALP governments.*
- Read more in the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2324a/24bd34).
- ### Text of part 2 of schedule 4
- > *Part 2 — Assistance from Attorney-General*
- >
- >> *Native Title Act 1993*
- >>
- >> *8 Subsection 94P(1) (table item 3)*
- >>
- >>> *Repeal the item.*
- >>
- >> *9 Section 213A*
- >>
- >>> *Repeal the section.*
- >>
- >> *10 Application of amendments*
- >>
- >>> *(1) Despite the repeal of item 3 of the table in subsection 94P(1) of the Native Title Act 1993 by this Part, that item continues to apply, in relation to parties provided with funds before the commencement of this Part, as if that repeal had not happened.*
- >>>
- >>> *(2) If:*
- >>>
- >>>> *(a) a person has, before the commencement of this Part, made an application for the provision of assistance under section 213A of the Native Title Act 1993 3; and*
- >>>>
- >>>> *(b) the Attorney-General has not, before that time, made a decision on the application;*
- >>>>
>>>> *the application is taken never to have been made.*- >>>> *the application is taken never to have been made.*
-
-
|
|
senate vote 2024-05-16#38
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2024-09-08 18:50:14
|
Title
Bills — Attorney-General's Portfolio Miscellaneous Measures Bill 2023; Second Reading- Attorney-General's Portfolio Miscellaneous Measures Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Native Title Respondents Scheme
Description
<p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p><p>The question is that part 2 of schedule 4 stand as printed.</p>-
- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2024-05-16.240.1) "*that part 2 of schedule 4 stand as printed*". In other words, they voted to keep that part as it is. This motion was introduced in response to an amendment that:
- > *(1) Schedule 4, Part 2, page 55 (lines 1 to 18), to be opposed.*
- ### What is part 2 of schedule 4?
- According to the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2324a/24bd34):
- > *Part 2 of Schedule 4 of the Bill repeals section 213A of the Native Title Act 1993. This section, ‘Assistance from Attorney General’, provides the statutory basis for the Native Title Respondents Scheme (NTRS) (also referred to as the Native Title Respondents Funding Scheme) and the associated Native Title Officer Funding Scheme (NTOFS) (‘the schemes’). Repealing this section (and the accompanying repeal of subsection94P, dealing with reports about breaches of the requirement to act in good faith by recipients of NTRS funds) has the effect of abolishing the schemes.*
- Read more in the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2324a/24bd34).
- ### Text of part 2 of schedule 4
- > *Part 2 — Assistance from Attorney-General*
- >
- >> *Native Title Act 1993*
- >>
- >> *8 Subsection 94P(1) (table item 3)*
- >>
- >>> *Repeal the item.*
- >>
- >> *9 Section 213A*
- >>
- >>> *Repeal the section.*
- >>
- >> *10 Application of amendments*
- >>
- >>> *(1) Despite the repeal of item 3 of the table in subsection 94P(1) of the Native Title Act 1993 by this Part, that item continues to apply, in relation to parties provided with funds before the commencement of this Part, as if that repeal had not happened.*
- >>>
- >>> *(2) If:*
- >>>
- >>>> *(a) a person has, before the commencement of this Part, made an application for the provision of assistance under section 213A of the Native Title Act 1993 3; and*
- >>>>
- >>>> *(b) the Attorney-General has not, before that time, made a decision on the application;*
- >>>>
- >>>> *the application is taken never to have been made.*
<p> <i>The opposition opposed part 2 of schedule</i> <i> 4 in the following terms—</i></p><p class="italic">(1) Schedule 4, Part 2, page 55 (lines 1 to 18), to be opposed.</p><p></p><p></p> -
-
|