All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
Change |
Division |
senate vote 2023-11-09#2
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2023-11-10 16:13:08
|
Title
Committees — Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Reference
- Committees - Education and Employment Legislation Committee; Reference - Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Bill 2023
Description
<p class="speaker">Wendy Askew</p>
<p>At the request of Senator Cash, I move:</p>
-
- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2023-11-09.38.1) introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Wendy Askew](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/wendy_askew) (Liberal), which means it was successful and the [inquiry will be set up](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Education_and_Employment/ClosingLoopholes).
- ### Motion text
- > *That the Senate—*
- >
- > *(a) notes that the Albanese Labor Government's Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Bill 2023 is complex and requires intense scrutiny;*
- >
- > *(b) requires the Education and Employment Legislation Committee to hold a public hearing on Monday, 22 January 2024 from 9.30 am to 5 pm for the purposes of its inquiry into the bill:*
- >
- >> *(i) to hear from representatives of the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations for no less than four hours, from 9.30 am,*
- >>
- >> *(ii) to hear from any additional witnesses, as resolved by the Education and Employment Legislation Committee, and*
- >>
- >> *(iii) the Education and Employment Legislation Committee can resolve to conclude the hearing earlier only after paragraph (b)(i) is satisfied; and*
- >
- > *(c) requires that the Education and Employment Legislation Committee must not report earlier than its current reporting date of 1 February 2024.*
<p class="italic">That the Senate—</p>
<p class="italic">(a) notes that the Albanese Labor Government's Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Bill 2023 is complex and requires intense scrutiny;</p>
<p class="italic">(b) requires the Education and Employment Legislation Committee to hold a public hearing on Monday, 22 January 2024 from 9.30 am to 5 pm for the purposes of its inquiry into the bill:</p>
<p class="italic">(i) to hear from representatives of the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations for no less than four hours, from 9.30 am,</p>
<p class="italic">(ii) to hear from any additional witnesses, as resolved by the Education and Employment Legislation Committee, and</p>
<p class="italic">(iii) the Education and Employment Legislation Committee can resolve to conclude the hearing earlier only after paragraph (b)(i) is satisfied; and</p>
<p class="italic">(c) requires that the Education and Employment Legislation Committee must not report earlier than its current reporting date of 1 February 2024.</p>
<p class="speaker">Anthony Chisholm</p>
<p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p>
<p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>
<p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p>
<p class="speaker">Anthony Chisholm</p>
<p>The government will not be supporting this motion. We have never supported any delay to this bill, and that remains the government's position. This should be called out for what it is: nothing more than a stunt designed to delay the bill further. This inquiry has already held more hearings than any other inquiry on industrial relations legislation in the history of the Fair Work Act. We don't support delaying the bill, because every day of delay is another day where workers in the gig economy and road transport industry have no minimum standards; wage theft remains not a criminal offence; labour hire can be used to undercut agreed rates of pay; and casuals can be on permanent hours for years on end without any of the security of permanent work. Voting to delay this bill is voting to keep the loopholes undercutting pay and conditions open. The government urges the Senate to reject any further delays to this bill.</p>
<p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>
<p>The question is that general business notice of motion No. 378 standing in the name of Senator Cash and moved by Senator Askew be agreed to.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
-
-
|