All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change Division
senate vote 2021-08-26#3

Edited by mackay staff

on 2021-08-27 10:19:53

Title

  • Documents Collinsville Coal-Fired Power Station; Order for the Production of Documents
  • Documents - Collinsville Coal-Fired Power Station - Order for the Production of Documents

Description

  • <p class="speaker">Anne Urquhart</p>
  • <p>At the request of Senator Chisholm, I move:</p>
  • <p class="italic">That there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Minister for Energy and Emissions Reduction, by no later than 10 am on Monday, 30 August 2021, the feasibility study regarding Shine Energy's proposed coal-fired power station in Collinsville, prepared by Shine Energy and provided to the Department of Industry Science, Energy and Resources and/or the Minister for Energy and Emissions Reduction.</p>
  • The same number of senators voted for and against a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2021-08-26.56.1) introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Anne Urquhart](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/anne_urquhart) (Labor), which means it failed.
  • ### Motion text
  • > *That there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Minister for Energy and Emissions Reduction, by no later than 10 am on Monday, 30 August 2021, the feasibility study regarding Shine Energy's proposed coal-fired power station in Collinsville, prepared by Shine Energy and provided to the Department of Industry Science, Energy and Resources and/or the Minister for Energy and Emissions Reduction.*
  • <p class="speaker">Anne Ruston</p>
  • <p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p>
  • <p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Anne Ruston</p>
  • <p>The government will not be supporting this motion, as the document requested does not yet exist. The government refer the Senate to our statements on the previous occasions when these documents were sought for further details.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p>
  • <p>The question is that motion No. 1228 be agreed to.</p>