All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2021-06-15#2
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2021-06-17 14:27:53
|
Title
Motions — Jobkeeper Payment- Motions - Jobkeeper Payment - Repay excess funds
Description
<p class="speaker">Nick McKim</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">(1) That the Senate—</p>- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2021-06-15.172.1) introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Nick McKim](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/nick_mckim) (Greens), which means it passed. Motions like these don't make any actual changes on their own, but are politically influential because they represent the will of the Senate.
- Queensland Senator [Gerard Rennick](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/gerard_rennick) (Liberal) [rebelled](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/crossing-the-floor/) against the rest of his party and voted "Yes" against the rest of his party (who voted No).
- ### Motion text
- > *(1) That the Senate—*
- >
- >> *(a) notes that the 2020-21 Budget delivered the JobKeeper wage subsidy, which saw over $1 billion in JobKeeper payments paid to companies that made a profit or paid executive bonuses; and*
- >>
- >> *(b) calls on the Federal Government to require companies with an annual turnover of more than $50 million that received JobKeeper payments, and in the last 12 months did one or more of the following:*
- >>
- >>> *(i) issued dividends,*
- >>>
- >>> *(ii) made a profit, or*
- >>>
- >>> *(iii) paid executive bonuses;*
- >>
- >> *to repay the Commonwealth an amount equal to the amount of JobKeeper payments they received, up to the sum of profits made and executive bonuses paid.*
- >
- > *(2) That this resolution be sent to the House of Representatives for concurrence.*
<p class="italic">(a) notes that the 2020-21 Budget delivered the JobKeeper wage subsidy, which saw over $1 billion in JobKeeper payments paid to companies that made a profit or paid executive bonuses; and</p><p class="italic">(b) calls on the Federal Government to require companies with an annual turnover of more than $50 million that received JobKeeper payments, and in the last 12 months did one or more of the following:</p><p class="italic">(i) issued dividends,</p><p class="italic">(ii) made a profit, or</p><p class="italic">(iii) paid executive bonuses;</p><p class="italic">to repay the Commonwealth an amount equal to the amount of JobKeeper payments they received, up to the sum of profits made and executive bonuses paid.</p><p class="italic">(2) That this resolution be sent to the House of Representatives for concurrence.</p> <p class="speaker">Malcolm Roberts</p><p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p> <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p><p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p> <p class="speaker">Malcolm Roberts</p><p>One Nation supports this motion. Many broad-stroke policies were voted through in the early days of COVID due to the uncertainty at the time. And yet mistakes were made, and these must be admitted and addressed. In some cases, JobKeeper payments went to companies with no need for the money and who used the money for purposes having nothing to do with the intent of JobKeeper, which was to protect jobs and to help workers and families get through tough times. Mega car dealership Eagers Automotive claimed JobKeeper and then paid out dividends for almost the exact same amount—$67 million. Star Casino received $64 million and then gave CEO Matt Bekier an equity bonus of $800,000.</p><p>Without basic governance, greed has come out to play. Company executives purloining JobKeeper for their own financial benefit does not pass the pub test. It's time this government stopped running the country for the benefit of its big-business mates and started caring about the people paying for all of this—Australian taxpayers, current and future.</p> <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p><p>The question is that general business notice of motion No. 1117 standing in the name of Senator McKim be agreed to.</p>
|