All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2021-05-13#2
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2022-09-02 10:54:46
|
Title
Business — Consideration of Legislation- Business - Consideration of Legislation - Migration Amendment (Clarifying International Obligations for Removal) Bill 2021
Description
<p class="speaker">Jane Hume</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the provisions of paragraphs (5) to (8) of standing order 111 not apply to the following bills, allowing them to be considered during this period of sittings:</p><p class="italic">Competition and Consumer Amendment (Motor Vehicle Service and Repair Information Sharing Scheme) Bill 2021</p><p class="italic">Education Legislation Amendment (2021 Measures No. 2) Bill 2021</p><p class="italic">Migration Amendment (Clarifying International Obligations for Removal) Bill 2021</p><p class="italic">Migration Amendment (Tabling Notice of Certain Character Decisions) Bill 2021</p><p class="italic">Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Student Assistance and Other Measures) Bill 2021.</p> <p class="speaker">Rachel Siewert</p><p>The Greens propose to vote differently on some of the bills that are contained in the exemption, so we ask that the question on the Migration Amendment (Clarifying International Obligations for Removal) Bill 2021 be put separately.</p> <p class="speaker">Carol Brown</p><p>Yes, that's fine. We will do all the bills except for the Migration Amendment (Clarifying International Obligations for Removal) Bill 2021. The question is that the bills be exempted from the cut-off.</p><p>Question agreed to.</p><p>The question is that the Migration Amendment (Clarifying International Obligations for Removal) Bill 2021 be exempted from the cut-off.</p> -
- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2021-05-13.3.2) "*that the Migration Amendment (Clarifying International Obligations for Removal) Bill 2021 be exempted from the cut-off.*"
- In other words, they voted in favour of ignoring the usual rules - known as [standing orders](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/standing-orders/) - in order to discuss that bill in this sitting period.
-
-
|