Paid Parental Leave Amendment (Flexibility Measures) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Criticism of welfare cuts
Not passed by a small majority
No rebellions 97% attendance
Division last edited 3rd Jul 2020 by mackay staff
The same number of senators voted for and against a request introduced by South Australian Senator Stirling Griff (Centre Alliance), which means it failed.
Senator Griff explained:
This request is framed to increase the classes of persons who can claim parental leave pay. It is fully costed, and it would allow the biological father of a child or the partner of a child's birth mother to make a primary claim for parental leave pay for a child if the child's birth mother does not or is not likely to satisfy the income test at the relevant time.
As I noted in my speech, there is inequity between two families on the same combined income: they would be eligible if the man were the higher income earner but not eligible if the woman were the higher income earner, which is just unfair. The current rules just don't reflect the realities of modern parenting, with more dads staying at home to care for children. The number of stay-at-home fathers has grown to 80,000 in 2016, based on the latest census data. It is time to move away from models that assume children will be cared for by a primary carer who is the mother. Modern parents don't define themselves in this way, and it's time the legislation doesn't either.
That the House of Representatives be requested to make the following amendment:
(1) Schedule 1, page 34 (after line 26), after item 111, insert:
111A After paragraph 54(1)(a)
Insert:
(aa) if the child's birth mother is unlikely to satisfy the income test on the child's expected date of birth, or did not satisfy the income test on the day the child was born:
(i) the biological father of the child; or
(ii) the partner of the child's birth mother;
Statement pursuant to the order of the Senate of 26 June 2000
Amendment (1)
Amendment (1) is framed as a request because it amends the bill in a way that is intended to increase the classes of persons who can claim parental leave pay.
The amendment would allow the biological father of a child or the partner of the child's birth mother to make a primary claim for parental leave pay for a child, if the child's birth mother does not, or is not likely to, satisfy the income test at the relevant time.
As this will increase the number of persons who would be eligible to receive parental leave pay, the amendment will increase the amount of expenditure under the standing appropriation in section 307 of thePaid Parental Leave Act 2010.
Statement by the Clerk of the Senate pursuant to the order of the Senate of 26 June 2000
Amendment (1)
If the effect of the amendment is to increase expenditure under the standing appropriation in section 307 of thePaid Parental Leave Act 2010 then it is in accordance with the precedents of the Senate that the amendment be moved as a request.
Nobody rebelled against their party.
Party | Votes | |
---|---|---|
Australian Greens (78% turnout) | 7 Yes – 0 No | |
Richard Di Natale Victoria | Yes | |
Mehreen Faruqi NSW | Yes | |
Sarah Hanson-Young SA | Yes | |
Nick McKim Tasmania | Yes | |
Rachel Siewert WA | Yes | |
Larissa Waters Queensland | Yes | |
Peter Whish-Wilson Tasmania | Yes | |
Janet Rice Victoria | Absent | |
Jordon Steele-John WA | Absent | |
Australian Labor Party (76% turnout) | 19 Yes – 0 No | |
Tim Ayres NSW | Yes | |
Catryna Bilyk Tasmania | Yes | |
Kim Carr Victoria | Yes | |
Anthony Chisholm Queensland | Yes | |
Raff Ciccone Victoria | Yes | |
Patrick Dodson WA | Yes | |
Don Farrell SA | Yes | |
Alex Gallacher SA | Yes | |
Katy Gallagher ACT | Yes | |
Nita Green Queensland | Yes | |
Kimberley Kitching Victoria | Yes | |
Malarndirri McCarthy NT | Yes | |
Deborah O'Neill NSW | Yes | |
Louise Pratt WA | Yes | |
Tony Sheldon NSW | Yes | |
Glenn Sterle WA | Yes | |
Anne Urquhart Tasmania | Yes | |
Jess Walsh Victoria | Yes | |
Murray Watt Queensland | Yes | |
Carol Brown Tasmania | Absent | |
Kristina Keneally NSW | Absent | |
Jenny McAllister NSW | Absent | |
Helen Polley Tasmania | Absent | |
Marielle Smith SA | Absent | |
Penny Wong SA | Absent | |
Centre Alliance (100% turnout) | 2 Yes – 0 No | |
Stirling Griff SA | Yes | |
Rex Patrick SA | Yes | |
Sam McMahon NT Country Liberal Party | No | |
Sue Lines WA Deputy President | Yes | |
Jacqui Lambie Tasmania Jacqui Lambie Network | Yes | |
Liberal National Party (100% turnout) | 0 Yes – 2 No | |
Matthew Canavan Queensland | No | |
James McGrath Queensland | No | |
Liberal Party (72% turnout) | 0 Yes – 21 No | |
Alex Antic SA | No | |
Wendy Askew Tasmania | No | |
Simon Birmingham SA | No | |
Slade Brockman WA | No | |
Michaelia Cash WA | No | |
Claire Chandler Tasmania | No | |
Richard Colbeck Tasmania | No | |
Jonathon Duniam Tasmania | No | |
Concetta Fierravanti-Wells NSW | No | |
Sarah Henderson Victoria | No | |
Hollie Hughes NSW | No | |
Jane Hume Victoria | No | |
Andrew McLachlan SA | No | |
Jim Molan NSW | No | |
Matt O'Sullivan WA | No | |
James Paterson Victoria | No | |
Gerard Rennick Queensland | No | |
Anne Ruston SA | No | |
Paul Scarr Queensland | No | |
Dean Smith WA | No | |
David Van Victoria | No | |
Eric Abetz Tasmania | Absent | |
Andrew Bragg NSW | Absent | |
Mathias Cormann WA | Absent | |
David Fawcett SA | Absent | |
Marise Payne NSW | Absent | |
Linda Reynolds WA | Absent | |
Zed Seselja ACT | Absent | |
Amanda Stoker Queensland | Absent | |
National Party (100% turnout) | 0 Yes – 3 No | |
Perin Davey NSW | No | |
Susan McDonald Queensland | No | |
Bridget McKenzie Victoria | No | |
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party (100% turnout) | 0 Yes – 2 No | |
Pauline Hanson Queensland | No | |
Malcolm Roberts Queensland | No | |
Scott Ryan Victoria President | No | |
Totals (79% turnout) | 30 Yes – 30 No |
Turnout is the percentage of members eligible to vote that did vote.