All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2020-02-10#2
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2020-02-21 09:43:10
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2020-02-10.93.1) to agree with the main idea of the bill. This means they can now discuss it in more detail. In parliamentary jargon, they voted to read the bill for a [second time](https://www.peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/).
- ### What is the bill's main idea?
- The [purpose of the bill](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/s1248) is "to require masters of certain vessels to conduct two headcounts of passengers, one at the start of a voyage and one at the end."
- ### Background to the bill
- According to the bill's [explanatory memorandum](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fems%2Fs1248_ems_55211ee9-0b50-4a0a-9cd9-6a5247efaf5d%22;rec=0):
- > *This bill is needed to avoid a similar case occurring to that which happened with the [tragic loss of Mr Damien Mills](https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-06/inquest-into-death-of-damien-mills-on-perth-cruise/8593166) when he fell off the back of a boat undetected and died in 2014. Had the master of that vessel conducted a headcount when the boat got back to Fremantle, they would have realised that Mr Mills was missing and they could have alerted the appropriate authorities. WA Water Police, in giving evidence to the Senate’s Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee’s inquiry into the performance of the Australian Maritime Safety Authority, stated that had they been made aware that Mr Mills had fallen overboard at the time the vessel docked, they would have had a very strong chance of finding him alive.*
|
|
senate vote 2020-02-10#2
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2020-02-21 09:39:34
|
Title
Bills — Marine Safety (Domestic Commercial Vessel) National Law Amendment (Improving Safety) Bill 2019; Second Reading- Marine Safety (Domestic Commercial Vessel) National Law Amendment (Improving Safety) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea
Description
<p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p><p>The question is the bill be now read a second time.</p> - The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2020-02-10.93.1) to agree with the main idea of the bill. This means they can now discuss it in more detail. In parliamentary jargon, they voted to read the bill for a [second time](https://www.peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/).
- ### What is the bill's main idea?
- The [purpose of the bill](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/s1248) is "to require masters of certain vessels to conduct two headcounts of passengers, one at the start of a voyage and one at the end."
|