All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change Division
senate vote 2019-11-14#7

Edited by mackay staff

on 2019-11-15 15:14:27

Title

  • Motions National Relay Service
  • Motions - National Relay Service - CapTel users

Description

  • <p class="speaker">Anne Urquhart</p>
  • <p>I move:</p>
  • <p class="italic">That the Senate&#8212;</p>
  • The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2019-11-14.133.1) introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Anne Urquhart](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/anne_urquhart) (Labor), which means it passed. Motions like these don't make any legal changes on their own but are politically influential because they represent the will of the Senate.
  • ### Motion text
  • > *That the Senate—*
  • >
  • > *(a) notes that:*
  • >
  • >> *(i.) the National Relay Service (NRS) allows deaf and hearing impaired Australians to make and receive telephone calls through the use of text relay services,*
  • >>
  • >> *(ii.) the NRS can be accessed through different options including CapTel, teletypewriters, SMS and internet relay,*
  • >>
  • >> *(iii.) the Federal Government has decided to end access to CapTel for NRS users as of 1 February 2020,*
  • >>
  • >> *(iv.) CapTel currently carries up to 60% of total call minutes generated by users who rely on the NRS,*
  • >>
  • >> *(v.) according to Australian Bureau of Statistics National Health Survey, the number of Australians over the age of 65 who are deaf or hearing impaired has increased from 1.016 million in 2012 to 1.211 million in 2018,*
  • >>
  • >> *(vi.) the Federal Government is reducing operational funding to the NRS from $27.7 million to $22 million per annum – a reduction of 20%, and*
  • >>
  • >> *(vii.) up to 3,500 elderly Australians, some whom live alone, currently rely on CapTel to stay in touch with family and friends, and to access emergency services;*
  • >
  • > *(b) further notes that:*
  • >
  • >> *(i.) the average age of a CapTel user is 82 years old,*
  • >>
  • >> *(ii.) many elderly deaf Australians impacted by this decision consider CapTel is the best technology to support their communications needs,*
  • >>
  • >> *(iii.) the Federal Government did not consult CapTel users on its decision, and*
  • >>
  • >> *(iv.) the Federal Government is seeking to force many CapTel users onto teletypewriters – in 2016, the Department of Communications referred to this technology as 'legacy' and sought views on phasing it out;*
  • >
  • > *(c) condemns the Federal Government for not consulting elderly CapTel users, or their concerned family members, before making a decision that would affect their welfare; and*
  • >
  • > *(d) calls on the Federal Government to stop imposing inferior communications options on CapTel users, and instead consult the community to find the best outcome.*
  • <p class="italic">(a) notes that:</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(i.) the National Relay Service (NRS) allows deaf and hearing impaired Australians to make and receive telephone calls through the use of text relay services,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(ii.) the NRS can be accessed through different options including CapTel, teletypewriters, SMS and internet relay,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(iii.) the Federal Government has decided to end access to CapTel for NRS users as of 1 February 2020,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(iv.) CapTel currently carries up to 60% of total call minutes generated by users who rely on the NRS,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(v.) according to Australian Bureau of Statistics National Health Survey, the number of Australians over the age of 65 who are deaf or hearing impaired has increased from 1.016 million in 2012 to 1.211 million in 2018,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(vi.) the Federal Government is reducing operational funding to the NRS from $27.7 million to $22 million per annum – a reduction of 20%, and</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(vii.) up to 3,500 elderly Australians, some whom live alone, currently rely on CapTel to stay in touch with family and friends, and to access emergency services;</p>
  • <p class="italic">(b) further notes that:</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(i.) the average age of a CapTel user is 82 years old,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(ii.) many elderly deaf Australians impacted by this decision consider CapTel is the best technology to support their communications needs,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(iii.) the Federal Government did not consult CapTel users on its decision, and</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(iv.) the Federal Government is seeking to force many CapTel users onto teletypewriters – in 2016, the Department of Communications referred to this technology as 'legacy' and sought views on phasing it out;</p>
  • <p class="italic">(c) condemns the Federal Government for not consulting elderly CapTel users, or their concerned family members, before making a decision that would affect their welfare; and</p>
  • <p class="italic">(d) calls on the Federal Government to stop imposing inferior communications options on CapTel users, and instead consult the community to find the best outcome.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Jonathon Duniam</p>
  • <p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p>
  • <p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Jonathon Duniam</p>
  • <p>The National Relay Service remains fully funded, at $22 million per year. The government has awarded Concentrix a new three-year contract to deliver the NRS, through a competitive tender process which was designed to get the best value for money and to meet different needs of people who rely on the NRS. The government stands ready to provide continued access to CapTel for existing users should the underlying rights holder, a US company, Ultratec, agree to provide access to Concentrix. No agreement has been reached, but discussions continue.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p>
  • <p>The question is that motion No. 248 be agreed to.</p>