|
senate vote 2018-11-12#8
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2018-11-23 18:06:58
|
Title
Motions — Carers- Motions - Carers - Superannuation guarantee
Description
<p class="speaker">Stirling Griff</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the Senate—</p>- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2018-11-12.140.1) introduced by Centre Alliance Senator [Stirling Griff](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/sa/stirling_griff), which means it passed. Motions like these don't make any legal changes on their own, but can be politically influential since they represent the will of the Senate.
- ### Motion text
- > *That the Senate—*
- > *(a) acknowledges that:*
- >> *(i) 14 October to 20 October 2018, was National Carers Week,*
- >> *(ii) Carers Australia values the work done by unpaid carers at an estimated $60 billion a year,*
- >> *(iii) women make up the majority of carers—women represent 68% of primary carers for elderly people and those with a disability, and 55.5% of all carers, according to the ABS' Disability, Ageing and Carers survey,*
- >> *(iv) the labour force participation rate for primary carers was 56% compared to non-carers at 80%, and 73% of males who were carers were employed compared with 60.8% of females,*
- >> *(v) according to Carers' Australia's report, The Benefit of Carers to the Economy, about 4% of employees become carers each year, and the probability of a new carer leaving the workforce is 8% – about 26% of primary carers reduce their work hours after taking on a caring role,*
- >> *(vi) the 2017 Hilda survey showed Australian women retire with just over half the amount of superannuation as men, or an average of $230,907, and one in three women retire with no superannuation at all,*
- >> *(vii) one of the reasons women retire with less superannuation is because of the extended periods of time they spend out of the workforce to care for children or elderly parents – as a result of their lower retirement savings, they are more likely to rely on the aged pension, and*
- >> *(viii) in 2016, the report of the Economics References Committee on the gender retirement income gap, recommended that superannuation be paid on the Commonwealth Paid Parental Leave Scheme; and*
- > *(b) calls on the Federal Government to:*
- >> *(i) model the costs and benefits of providing the superannuation guarantee to carers on the Carer Payment or other carer-related benefits, including the Commonwealth Paid Parental Leave Scheme, and*
- >> *(ii) seriously consider providing the superannuation guarantee to carers on the Carer Payment or other benefit they are paid as a result of their caring responsibilities.*
<p class="italic">(a) acknowledges that:</p><p class="italic">(i) 14 October to 20 October 2018, was National Carers Week,</p><p class="italic">(ii) Carers Australia values the work done by unpaid carers at an estimated $60 billion a year,</p><p class="italic">(iii) women make up the majority of carers—women represent 68% of primary carers for elderly people and those with a disability, and 55.5% of all carers, according to the ABS' Disability, Ageing and Carers survey,</p><p class="italic">(iv) the labour force participation rate for primary carers was 56% compared to non-carers at 80%, and 73% of males who were carers were employed compared with 60.8% of females,</p><p class="italic">(v) according to Carers' Australia's report, <i>The Benefit of Carers to the Economy</i>, about 4% of employees become carers each year, and the probability of a new carer leaving the workforce is 8% – about 26% of primary carers reduce their work hours after taking on a caring role,</p><p class="italic">(vi) the 2017 Hilda survey showed Australian women retire with just over half the amount of superannuation as men, or an average of $230,907, and one in three women retire with no superannuation at all,</p><p class="italic">(vii) one of the reasons women retire with less superannuation is because of the extended periods of time they spend out of the workforce to care for children or elderly parents – as a result of their lower retirement savings, they are more likely to rely on the aged pension, and</p><p class="italic">(viii) in 2016, the report of the Economics References Committee on the gender retirement income gap, recommended that superannuation be paid on the Commonwealth Paid Parental Leave Scheme; and</p><p class="italic">(b) calls on the Federal Government to:</p><p class="italic">(i) model the costs and benefits of providing the superannuation guarantee to carers on the Carer Payment or other carer-related benefits, including the Commonwealth Paid Parental Leave Scheme, and</p><p class="italic">(ii) seriously consider providing the superannuation guarantee to carers on the Carer Payment or other benefit they are paid as a result of their caring responsibilities.</p> <p class="speaker">Anne Ruston</p><p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p> <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p><p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p> <p class="speaker">Anne Ruston</p><p>More than $8 billion in social security payments to carers was provided in 2017-18. In recognition of the invaluable work carers perform, in the 2018-19 budget the government announced an additional $85.6 million over four years to fund new supports for carers through the new integrated carer support services model. This funding is in addition to the amount already spent on delivering carer support services, which was $169 million for 2017-18. The government has a suite of superannuation reforms currently before the Senate, which will boost retirement savings, including the retirement savings of women, by billions of dollars.</p> <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p><p>Senator Urquhart?</p> <p class="speaker">Anne Urquhart</p><p>I am seeking clarification. It was my understanding there was an amendment to this motion. Has that been amended?</p> <p class="speaker">Stirling Griff</p><p>I believe you should have the amendment. It has appeared. It's incorporated in the <i>Notice Paper</i>.</p> <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p><p>I have been advised by the Clerk that we are not sure the amendment has been circulated—I beg your pardon; I'm informed it has been incorporated into the <i>Notice Paper</i>. The question is that general business notice of motion No. 1164, standing in the name of Senator Griff, be agreed to.</p>
|