All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change Division
senate vote 2018-11-12#7

Edited by mackay staff

on 2018-11-23 15:06:52

Title

  • Motions Day of the Unborn Child
  • Motions - Day of the Unborn Child - Religious freedom

Description

  • <p class="speaker">Barry O&#39;Sullivan</p>
  • <p>I move:</p>
  • <p class="italic">That the Senate&#8212;</p>
  • The majority voted against a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2018-11-12.132.1) introduced by National Party Senator [Barry O'Sullivan](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/barry_o'sullivan) (QLD), which means it failed.
  • Note that only five Liberal Party Senators attended the vote, which is only 23% of the party, with four voting in favour of the motion and one - Liberal Senator [Jane Hume](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/victoria/jane_hume) (Vic) - [crossing the floor](https://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/crossing-the-floor.html) to vote 'No' against the rest of her party.
  • ### Motion text
  • > *That the Senate—*
  • > *(a) acknowledges that:*
  • >> *(i) the internationally-recognised Day of the Unborn Child is observed on 25 March as 'a positive option in favour of life and the spread of a culture for life to guarantee respect for human dignity in every situation',*
  • >> *(ii) religious observers attending Day of the Unborn Child services are continuously disrupted and harassed at annual protest rallies organised by pro-abortion groups, such as the University of Sydney Women's Collective, the University of New South Wales Women's Collective and Labour for Choice,*
  • >> *(iii) these protest rallies feature speakers who insult church-goers and accuse the church of supporting violence against women, and*
  • >> *(iv) then Bishop of Broken Bay, Peter Comensoli, has advocated for exclusion zones around religious activities, stating "if they're (activists) determined to have a safety zone, why not a safety zone around any activities that could be personally intimidating for those involved"; and*
  • > *(b) calls on all senators to:*
  • >> *(i) protect religious freedom in Australia,*
  • >> *(ii) note the hypocrisy of pro-abortion activists complaining about pro-life group activities near abortion clinics, while, at the same time, carrying out their own protest rallies against religious observances, and*
  • >> *(iii) support calls for pro-abortion activists to be banned from disrupting Day of the Unborn Child services across the nation.*
  • <p class="italic">(a) acknowledges that:</p>
  • <p class="italic">(i) the internationally-recognised Day of the Unborn Child is observed on 25 March as 'a positive option in favour of life and the spread of a culture for life to guarantee respect for human dignity in every situation',</p>
  • <p class="italic">(ii) religious observers attending Day of the Unborn Child services are continuously disrupted and harassed at annual protest rallies organised by pro-abortion groups, such as the University of Sydney Women's Collective, the University of New South Wales Women's Collective and Labour for Choice,</p>
  • <p class="italic">(iii) these protest rallies feature speakers who insult church-goers and accuse the church of supporting violence against women, and</p>
  • <p class="italic">(iv) then Bishop of Broken Bay, Peter Comensoli, has advocated for exclusion zones around religious activities, stating "if they're (activists) determined to have a safety zone, why not a safety zone around any activities that could be personally intimidating for those involved"; and</p>
  • <p class="italic">(b) calls on all senators to:</p>
  • <p class="italic">(i) protect religious freedom in Australia,</p>
  • <p class="italic">(ii) note the hypocrisy of pro-abortion activists complaining about pro-life group activities near abortion clinics, while, at the same time, carrying out their own protest rallies against religious observances, and</p>
  • <p class="italic">(iii) support calls for pro-abortion activists to be banned from disrupting Day of the Unborn Child services across the nation.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Anne Ruston</p>
  • <p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>
  • <p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Anne Ruston</p>
  • <p>As this motion involves a matter of conscience, in line with longstanding practice government senators are free to vote in accordance with their own conscience on matters relating to this motion.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Larissa Waters</p>
  • <p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>
  • <p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Larissa Waters</p>
  • <p>Senator O'Sullivan needs to get his hands and his rosaries off my ovaries and those of the 10,000 Queensland women who have an abortion every year, 10,000 women who have the right to make a decision about their own bodies without the opinion of Senator O'Sullivan getting in their way.</p>
  • <p>Senator O'Sullivan has never shared and will never share the experience of any of those women. He will never be faced with running a gauntlet of people calling him a murderer because he's made a decision about his own body. Do not stand there in judgement of women when you will never share their experiences and never understand their choices. A woman's body is her own and no man or anyone else in this building or anywhere else has any right to dictate what she does with it. You should be ashamed of yourself, seeking respect for a group of people trying to further oppress women and control their bodies.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>
  • <p>Senator Abetz on a point of order?</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Eric Abetz</p>
  • <p>Reference to a person's religious beliefs in speeches in this chamber have been, quite rightly, called out as being inappropriate. I think that the reference to Senator O'Sullivan's religion in relation to the rosary is such a matter that should be, and deserves and needs to be, withdrawn.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Larissa Waters</p>
  • <p>On the point of order: if that's the case then the whole motion shouldn't be proceeded with.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>
  • <p>On the point of order, I do remind senators that it is not appropriate to refer to the religious beliefs of any senator in this place. I would ask you to withdraw the comments, Senator Waters, without repeating them.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Larissa Waters</p>
  • <p>Deputy President, is Senator O'Sullivan going to withdraw his motion?</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>
  • <p>Senator Waters, I am applying the standing orders. I've simply asked you to withdraw the comments you made in relation to religion. I ask that you do that.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Larissa Waters</p>
  • <p>I withdraw only the remark to Senator O'Sullivan's rosary. I would like the rest of the statement to remain on the record.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>
  • <p>Senator Waters! Please resume your seat. It has been the practice for senators not to repeat the offence; it just creates further division. I would remind you just to withdraw when you stand in future. Thank you.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Jacinta Collins</p>
  • <p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>
  • <p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Jacinta Collins</p>
  • <p>Without endorsing Senator Waters's comments, the opposition will not be supporting the motion&#8212;but for different reasons. Once again, we are debating a motion which is complex in nature and misplaced in this section of the daily program. The issue that Senator O'Sullivan raises in this motion is, by its nature, a very complex one and one which deserves substantive debate and not a quick vote of the Senate.</p>
  • <p>This motion is also a poor conflation of the issues of safe access zones and religious freedom and freedom of association in Australia. It's fortunate that the motion now corrects the one factual error contained in the original motion proposed in the chamber weeks ago. Part of this motion refers to the now Archbishop of Melbourne, Peter Comensoli, when he was the Bishop for Broken Bay. The motion still incorrectly refers to an organisation called Labor for Choice. I'm glad to see that Senator O'Sullivan did correct one of these errors, but it's unfortunate&#8212; <i>(Time expired)</i></p>
  • <p class="speaker">Derryn Hinch</p>
  • <p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>
  • <p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Derryn Hinch</p>
  • <p>I just want to put on the record that I support every single word that Senator Waters said today.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>
  • <p>The question is that general business notice of motion No. 1116, standing in the name of Senator O'Sullivan, be agreed to.</p>