All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2018-08-16#4
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2023-06-16 09:15:48
|
Title
Business - Consideration of Legislation - National Broadcasters Legislation Amendment (Enhanced Transparency) Bill 2017,- Business - Consideration of Legislation - National Broadcasters Legislation Amendment (Enhanced Transparency) Bill 2017, Australian Broadcasting Corporation Amendment (Fair and Balanced) Bill 2017
Description
-
- The majority voted against a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2018-08-16.47.2) introduced by South Australian Senator [Sarah Hanson-Young](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/sa/sarah_hanson-young) (Greens), which means it failed.
- ### Motion text
- > *That, if by 13 September 2018:*
- >
- >> *(a) the government business order of the day relating to the consideration of the [National Broadcasters Legislation Amendment (Enhanced Transparency) Bill 2017](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s1111); and*
- >>
- >> *(b) the government business order of the day relating to the consideration of the [Australian Broadcasting Corporation Amendment (Fair and Balanced) Bill 2017](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s1095),*
- >
> *have not been finally considered, these orders of the day shall be discharged from the Notice Paper.*- > *have not been finally considered, these orders of the day shall be discharged from the Notice Paper.*
-
-
|
|
senate vote 2018-08-16#4
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2023-06-16 09:15:24
|
Title
Business — Consideration of Legislation- Business - Consideration of Legislation - National Broadcasters Legislation Amendment (Enhanced Transparency) Bill 2017,
Description
<p class="speaker">Sarah Hanson-Young</p><p>I move:</p>-
- The majority voted against a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2018-08-16.47.2) introduced by South Australian Senator [Sarah Hanson-Young](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/sa/sarah_hanson-young) (Greens), which means it failed.
- ### Motion text
- > *That, if by 13 September 2018:*
- >
- >> *(a) the government business order of the day relating to the consideration of the [National Broadcasters Legislation Amendment (Enhanced Transparency) Bill 2017](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s1111); and*
- >>
- >> *(b) the government business order of the day relating to the consideration of the [Australian Broadcasting Corporation Amendment (Fair and Balanced) Bill 2017](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s1095),*
- >
- > *have not been finally considered, these orders of the day shall be discharged from the Notice Paper.*
<p class="italic">That, if by 13 September 2018:</p><p class="italic">(a) the government business order of the day relating to the consideration of the National Broadcasters Legislation Amendment (Enhanced Transparency) Bill 2017; and</p><p class="italic">(b) the government business order of the day relating to the consideration of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation Amendment (Fair and Balanced) Bill 2017,</p><p class="italic">have not been finally considered, these orders of the day shall be discharged from the <i>Notice Paper</i>.</p> <p class="speaker">James McGrath</p><p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p><p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p> <p class="speaker">James McGrath</p><p>The government does not support this motion. Senators should oppose it not on the basis of the substance of these bills but to defend the principle that legislation ought to be afforded the opportunity of a proper debate on its merit before the Senate discharges it. It is the orthodox and longstanding practice of the Senate that the government of the day determines the listing and order of items of government business. This motion begs the question: why are the Greens so afraid of a proper debate about the modest and sensible measures in these bills to enhance the transparency and accountability of the ABC and SBS?</p> <p class="speaker">Anthony Chisholm</p><p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p><p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p> <p class="speaker">Anthony Chisholm</p><p>Labor strongly opposes these bills, but we do not support the motion to discharge them from the <i>Notice Paper</i>. The bills were introduced last year pursuant to yet another backroom deal between the government and One Nation as part of a full-scale attack on the ABC, which we've witnessed ever since. While it may suit the government and One Nation to have these bills hanging over the ABC and SBS as part of their strategy to menace and harass the public broadcasters, debate is a cornerstone of our democracy. Labor is prepared to debate these bills to demonstrate they are unnecessary, vindictive and hypocritical, to say the least. Labor calls on the government to bring these bills on for debate so the Senate can have its say on them substantively. We note the bills are, yet again, another example of the close relationship between the Turnbull government and One Nation.</p> <p class="speaker">Sarah Hanson-Young</p><p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p><p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p> <p class="speaker">Sarah Hanson-Young</p><p>The government has had 12 months to bring these bills forward for debate. This motion says that the bills must be debated by 13 September. There is still time, if the government wishes, for this place to debate these bills that were, of course, a result of a dirty deal done between the Turnbull government and One Nation. This just proves that the government has no guts in following through with these bills. It is holding them over the heads of the ABC and its staff. This is more attack from the Liberal Party and this government on the ABC and our public broadcasters. It's a disgrace. If you are prepared to debate the bills, bring it on. We will be more than happy to show you what the will of the people really is when it comes to defending our public broadcasters.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p><p>The question is that the motion moved by Senator Hanson-Young be agreed to.</p> -
-
|