All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2018-05-09#6
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2018-05-11 14:16:03
|
Title
Motions — Pensions and Benefits- Motions - Pensions and Benefits - Income support debts
Description
<p class="speaker">Rachel Siewert</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the Senate:</p>- The majority voted against a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2018-05-09.131.2) introduced by the Australian Greens Party, which means the motion was unsuccessful.
- ### Motion text
- > *That the Senate:*
- > *(a) notes that the Government intends to charge interest on income support debts;*
- > *(b) recognises that income support recipients often accrue debts through no fault of their own;*
- > *(c) considers this is a sledge-hammer approach and will disproportionately hurt Australians who have made a mistake or do not owe a debt at all; and*
- > *(d) urges the Federal Government to abandon this punitive approach and instead focus on measures that will decrease inequality and poverty. (general business notice of motion no. 801)*
<p class="italic">(a) notes that the Government intends to charge interest on income support debts;</p><p class="italic">(b) recognises that income support recipients often accrue debts through no fault of their own;</p><p class="italic">(c) considers this is a sledge-hammer approach and will disproportionately hurt Australians who have made a mistake or do not owe a debt at all; and</p><p class="italic">(d) urges the Federal Government to abandon this punitive approach and instead focus on measures that will decrease inequality and poverty. (<i>general business notice of motion no. 801</i>)</p> <p class="speaker">Anthony Chisholm</p><p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p><p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p> <p class="speaker">Anthony Chisholm</p><p>Labor has always been very clear that there is nothing wrong with requiring income support debts to be repaid, as long as those debts are genuine. Let's be very clear: this is a stunt by the Greens political party. It's nothing but symbolic. Nothing in the motion being debated today will address the huge issues the government has created through its lazy robodebt scam. If the Greens political party really wanted to do something to address unfair Centrelink debts then this is what they would be focusing on. This is our focus, so we will oppose the motion today and continue to concentrate on proper policy developments to address inequality in Australia.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p><p>The question is that general business notice of motion No. 801, standing in the name of Senator Siewert, be agreed to.</p>
|