Division Description Changes — Bills — Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016; First Reading — 2nd Mar 2016

Change	Division
senate vote 2016-03-02#7 Edited by mackay staff on 2016-07-07 11:28:30	Title Bills — Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016; First Reading Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016 - First Reading - Read for the first time Description ~~The PRESIDENT (11:45): The question is that the bill be now read a first time.~~ The majority voted in favour of reading the bill for a [first time](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html). In other words, the majority were in favour of formerly introducing the bill in to the Senate. According to [Odgers’ Australian Senate Practice](http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/odgers13?file=chapter12&section=05): > the first reading is normally passed without opposition and is regarded as a purely formal stage So, the fact that the Senate [divided](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/help/faq#division) to vote on this motion (rather than voting '[on the voices](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/voting-in-the-chambers.html)', like normal) shows that this bill was rather controversial. ### What does this bill do? The [bills digest](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1516a/16bd096) explains that: > [This bill] constitutes the first response of the Government to the reports of the [Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Electoral_Matters/2013_General_Election) from its inquiry into the [2013 Federal Election](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_federal_election%2C_2013), particularly in regards to the recommendations to change the Senate voting system. The recommended changes to the Senate electoral system by the Committee followed the election of senators on the basis of very small primary votes, and a perception that the group voting ticket system was being manipulated by some parties to direct preferences in a way that was not consistent with voter expectations. The bill has three parts: * First, it gets rid of group voting tickets and requires citizens voting 'above the line' to allocate at least six preferences so that their vote will only be counted against the candidates they preferenced and won't go to other parties that they didn't vote for at all (note that that the bill has a [savings provision](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1516a/16bd096) "that allow voters who allocate at least one vote above the line to have their ballot paper count as formal and the preferences counted") * Second, it prohibits an individual from being the registered officer of more than one political party at once * Third, it lets parties to submit a party logo to the [AEC](http://aec.gov.au/) to be added to their party registration to be printed on the ballot papers in black and white. Read more in the [bills digest](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1516a/16bd096).
senate vote 2016-03-02#7 Edited by brtrx on 2016-03-18 04:38:27	Title Description ~~<p class="speaker">Stephen Parry</p>~~ ~~<p>The question is that the bill be now read a first time.</p>~~ The PRESIDENT (11:45): The question is that the bill be now read a first time.

~~The PRESIDENT (11:45): The question is that the bill be now read a first time.~~
The majority voted in favour of reading the bill for a [first time](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html). In other words, the majority were in favour of formerly introducing the bill in to the Senate.
According to [Odgers’ Australian Senate Practice](http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/odgers13?file=chapter12&section=05):
> *the first reading is normally passed without opposition and is regarded as a purely formal stage*
So, the fact that the Senate [divided](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/help/faq#division) to vote on this motion (rather than voting '[on the voices](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/voting-in-the-chambers.html)', like normal) shows that this bill was rather controversial.
### What does this bill do?
The [bills digest](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1516a/16bd096) explains that:
> *[This bill] constitutes the first response of the Government to the reports of the [Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Electoral_Matters/2013_General_Election) from its inquiry into the [2013 Federal Election](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_federal_election%2C_2013), particularly in regards to the recommendations to change the Senate voting system. The recommended changes to the Senate electoral system by the Committee followed the election of senators on the basis of very small primary votes, and a perception that the group voting ticket system was being manipulated by some parties to direct preferences in a way that was not consistent with voter expectations.*
The bill has three parts:
* First, it gets rid of group voting tickets and requires citizens voting 'above the line' to allocate at least six preferences so that their vote will only be counted against the candidates they preferenced and won't go to other parties that they didn't vote for at all (note that that the bill has a [savings provision](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1516a/16bd096) *"that allow voters who allocate at least one vote above the line to have their ballot paper count as formal and the preferences counted"*)
* Second, it prohibits an individual from being the registered officer of more than one political party at once
* Third, it lets parties to submit a party logo to the [AEC](http://aec.gov.au/) to be added to their party registration to be printed on the ballot papers in black and white.
Read more in the [bills digest](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1516a/16bd096).