All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2015-11-09#3
Edited by
notasenator
on
2016-07-08 21:17:35
|
Title
Description
- Nationals senator [Matthew Canavan](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/matthew_canavan) moved that the Senate support freedom of speech and condemn the Greens for supporting restrictions on protests. [The motion was made in response to the Greens' campaign to make protesting outside abortion clinics illegal](https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/nov/09/senate-defeats-motion-claiming-ban-on-abortion-protest-is-attack-on-free-speech).
- The vote was tied, so it didn't pass.
- The State Parliaments decide on buffer zones, so even if this motion passed, the existing laws wouldn't change. [When this motion was introduced, only Tasmania had buffer zone laws, but by the end of the month, Victoria also had them](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_protection_of_access_to_abortion#Laws_in_Australia).
- ### Wording of the motion
- > That the Senate notes:
- >> (a) the important role freedom of speech plays in the exercise of public debate;
- >> (b) that informed public debate requires the expression of different views, even if you disagree with them;
- >> (c) that this nation has fought wars for democracy, for freedom of speech and for the right to protest; and
- >> (d) that attempts by the Australian Greens and their supporters to introduce legislation banning peaceful protest from public areas is an attack on a fundamental right and should be opposed.
|
|
senate vote 2015-11-09#3
Edited by
notasenator
on
2016-07-08 20:48:51
|
Title
Description
<p class="speaker">Matthew Canavan</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the Senate notes:</p>- Nationals senator [Matthew Canavan](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/matthew_canavan) moved that the Senate support freedom of speech and condemn the Greens for supporting restrictions on protests. [The motion was made in response to the Greens' campaign to make protesting outside abortion clinics illegal](https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/nov/09/senate-defeats-motion-claiming-ban-on-abortion-protest-is-attack-on-free-speech).
- The vote was tied, so it didn't pass.
- ### Wording of the motion
- > That the Senate notes:
- >> (a) the important role freedom of speech plays in the exercise of public debate;
- >> (b) that informed public debate requires the expression of different views, even if you disagree with them;
- >> (c) that this nation has fought wars for democracy, for freedom of speech and for the right to protest; and
- >> (d) that attempts by the Australian Greens and their supporters to introduce legislation banning peaceful protest from public areas is an attack on a fundamental right and should be opposed.
<p class="italic">(a) the important role freedom of speech plays in the exercise of public debate;</p><p class="italic">(b) that informed public debate requires the expression of different views, even if you disagree with them;</p><p class="italic">(c) that this nation has fought wars for democracy, for freedom of speech and for the right to protest; and</p><p class="italic">(d) that attempts by the Australian Greens and their supporters to introduce legislation banning peaceful protest from public areas is an attack on a fundamental right and should be opposed.</p> <p class="speaker">Larissa Waters</p><p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p> <p class="speaker">Gavin Marshall</p><p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p> <p class="speaker">Larissa Waters</p><p>This is a clumsy and amateur attempt by Senator Canavan, who is trying to use free speech as an argument to stop women accessing abortions. Women should be able to access this safe and legal medical procedure without being confronted, harassed or intimidated. I am proud that Tasmania has laws for exclusion zones around abortion clinics and that in the ACT we Greens are moving for that, too. Anyone who disagrees with abortion should be free to voice their beliefs, but not to upset or intimidate women outside clinics, when they are clearly in vulnerable and difficult circumstances. This is not a freedom of speech issue; this is an issue of safe and accessible health care. Women have the legal right to medical privacy and the human right to make choices about their own health without interference or harassment. Just as we believe in the right to free speech but not hate speech, we must defend the right to protest but not in a way that infringes on an individual's right to access services for her own health.</p> <p class="speaker">Gavin Marshall</p><p>The question is that general business notice of motion No. 913 be agreed to.</p><p></p>
|