All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2015-03-18#2
Edited by
Luke Bacon
on
2015-06-16 13:59:43
|
Title
Description
- The majority disagreed with Senator Bob Day's motion:
- >That the Senate—
- >
- >(a) condemns the deliberate restriction of land for new housing and subsequent price gouging by state and territory land management agencies; and
- >
- >(b) highlights the constraints on land supply which are the principal causes of worsening housing affordability.
- Four Coalition Senators [rebelled against their party](http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-20/nationals-cross-floor-to-send-message-to-coalition-counterparts/6334014).
The Greens voted against the motion because [they disagreed](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2015-03-18.121.4) that land supply is the principal cause of worsening housing affordability.- The Greens voted against the motion because [they disagreed](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2015-03-18.121.4) that land supply is the principal cause of worsening housing affordability.
- This relates to another division, [*Motions — That constraints on land supply are the principal cause of worsening housing affordability*](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/divisions/senate/2015-05-13/5), on the 13th of May 2015.
|
|
senate vote 2015-03-18#2
Edited by
Henare Degan
on
2015-03-20 09:11:26
|
Title
Description
<p class="speaker">Bob Day</p><p>I, and also on behalf of Senator Leyonhjelm and Senator Lambie, move:</p><p class="italic">That the Senate—</p>- The majority disagreed with Senator Bob Day's motion:
- >That the Senate—
- >
- >(a) condemns the deliberate restriction of land for new housing and subsequent price gouging by state and territory land management agencies; and
- >
- >(b) highlights the constraints on land supply which are the principal causes of worsening housing affordability.
- Four Coalition Senators [rebelled against their party](http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-20/nationals-cross-floor-to-send-message-to-coalition-counterparts/6334014).
- The Greens voted against the motion because [they disagreed](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2015-03-18.121.4) that land supply is the principal cause of worsening housing affordability.
<p class="italic">(a) condemns the deliberate restriction of land for new housing and subsequent price gouging by state and territory land management agencies; and</p><p class="italic">(b) highlights the constraints on land supply which are the principal causes of worsening housing affordability.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ludlam</p><p>I seek leave to make a brief statement.</p> <p class="speaker">Stephen Parry</p><p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ludlam</p><p>The Australian Greens will not be supporting this motion, mainly because the second part, which goes to the issue of land supply, asks the Senate to agree that land supply is the principal cause of worsening housing affordability. I think that is, unfortunately, flat wrong. There is no question that it is a factor, but that kind of oversimplification of the housing—</p><p class="italic">Senator Day interjecting—</p><p>What would you know? When was the last time you visited, Senator Day, a mining town in the north-west of Western Australia? It is not simply land supply—</p><p>Honourable senators interjecting—</p><p>You might learn something if you just settle down. In some markets, it is population growth, the mining boom and construction costs. What about a tax system that has pitted investors against young first home buyers? A simple-minded concentration on land supply is stranding many young families—far from jobs, services and public transport—a long way from town. It is much more complex than this motion would indicate.</p> <p class="speaker">Stephen Parry</p><p>The question is that the motion moved by Senator Day be agreed to.</p><p></p>
|