All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2013-03-13#2
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:18:00
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2013-03-13.106.5 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Scott_Ludlam&mpc=Senate&house=senate Scott Ludlam], which means that it was rejected. The motion was:''That the Senate—''''(a) notes that:''''(i) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_mining_in_Australia Australian uranium] is confirmed to have been present in each of the reactors at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_Nuclear_Power_Plant Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear power station] on 11 March 2011,''''(ii) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster the disaster] is ongoing 2 years later, with continuing radiation leaks, and that 160 000 people remain displaced from their homes with inadequate compensation to resettle,''''(iii) decommissioning is expected to take over 40 years at a cost of A$100 billion, and''''(iv) approximately 2 000 samples of food and game tested for radiation between April 2012 and January 2013 exceeded the limit for human consumption of radioactive isotopes; and''''(b) calls on the Australian Government to undertake an immediate review of all bilateral uranium supply arrangements to assess the risk of future disasters at nuclear power stations in countries to which Australia supplies uranium.''- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2013-03-13.106.5) introduced by Greens Senator [Scott Ludlam](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Scott_Ludlam&mpc=Senate&house=senate), which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
- _That the Senate—_
- _(a) notes that:_
- _(i) [Australian uranium](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_mining_in_Australia) is confirmed to have been present in each of the reactors at the [Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear power station](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_Nuclear_Power_Plant) on 11 March 2011,_
- _(ii) [the disaster](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster) is ongoing 2 years later, with continuing radiation leaks, and that 160 000 people remain displaced from their homes with inadequate compensation to resettle,_
- _(iii) decommissioning is expected to take over 40 years at a cost of A$100 billion, and_
- _(iv) approximately 2 000 samples of food and game tested for radiation between April 2012 and January 2013 exceeded the limit for human consumption of radioactive isotopes; and_
- _(b) calls on the Australian Government to undertake an immediate review of all bilateral uranium supply arrangements to assess the risk of future disasters at nuclear power stations in countries to which Australia supplies uranium._
|
|
senate vote 2013-03-13#2
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-08-14 12:13:43
|
Title
Motions — Uranium Exports- Motions — Uranium Exports - Review all bilateral uranium supply arrangements
Description
<p class="speaker">Scott Ludlam</p><p>I seek leave to make a short statement before moving motion 1172.</p> <p class="speaker">Stephen Parry</p>- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2013-03-13.106.5 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Scott_Ludlam&mpc=Senate&house=senate Scott Ludlam], which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
- ''That the Senate—''
- ''(a) notes that:''
- ''(i) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_mining_in_Australia Australian uranium] is confirmed to have been present in each of the reactors at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_Nuclear_Power_Plant Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear power station] on 11 March 2011,''
- ''(ii) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster the disaster] is ongoing 2 years later, with continuing radiation leaks, and that 160 000 people remain displaced from their homes with inadequate compensation to resettle,''
- ''(iii) decommissioning is expected to take over 40 years at a cost of A$100 billion, and''
- ''(iv) approximately 2 000 samples of food and game tested for radiation between April 2012 and January 2013 exceeded the limit for human consumption of radioactive isotopes; and''
- ''(b) calls on the Australian Government to undertake an immediate review of all bilateral uranium supply arrangements to assess the risk of future disasters at nuclear power stations in countries to which Australia supplies uranium.''
<p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ludlam</p><p>I thank the Senate. This motion has one very simple operative clause, which is to call for an urgent review of bilateral so-called safeguards agreements between Australia and its uranium customer countries, including the majority of the world's nuclear weapons states, to ascertain the risk of future nuclear disasters in countries that buy Australian uranium, be it Japan, India, Russia, China or any of the other countries to which we sell uranium. We have a number of Japanese guests from the village of Iitate, Fukushima Prefecture, that I visited last year, in Parliament House this afternoon. The message to Australian policymakers could not be clearer. Their region has been depopulated and fisheries, horticultural and agricultural industries have been completely shattered, with 160,000 people still homeless as a result of that disaster. This is on top of the colossal carnage caused by the tsunami along the Pacific coast of Japan. Their message to Australian policymakers is: stop selling uranium.</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the Senate—</p><p class="italic">(a) notes that:</p><p class="italic">(i) Australian uranium is confirmed to have been present in each of the reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear power station on 11 March 2011,</p><p class="italic">(ii) the disaster is ongoing 2 years later, with continuing radiation leaks, and that 160 000 people remain displaced from their homes with inadequate compensation to resettle,</p><p class="italic">(iii) decommissioning is expected to take over 40 years at a cost of A$100 billion, and</p><p class="italic">(iv) approximately 2 000 samples of food and game tested for radiation between April 2012 and January 2013 exceeded the limit for human consumption of radioactive isotopes; and</p><p class="italic">(b) calls on the Australian Government to undertake an immediate review of all bilateral uranium supply arrangements to assess the risk of future disasters at nuclear power stations in countries to which Australia supplies uranium.</p> <p class="speaker">Stephen Parry</p><p>The question is that the motion be agreed to.</p>
|