All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change Division
senate vote 2012-08-16#1

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:20:52

Title

Description

  • The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-08-16.28.2 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Peter_Whish-Wilson&mpc=Senate&house=senate Peter Whish-Wilson], which means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:
  • ''That the Senate—''
  • ''(a) notes, in regard to the introduction of the factory ship [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris] to the Australian Small [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pelagic_fish Pelagic] Fishery, the range of significant and justifiable concerns, including but not limited to:''
  • ''(i) the localised depletion of fish stocks,''
  • ''(ii) mammalian by-catch, including seals and dolphins,''
  • ''(iii) impacts on other industries, including tourism,''
  • ''(iv) the assertion that this super trawler is only economically viable because it previously received European Union subsidies and the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Fisheries_Management_Authority Australian Fisheries Management Authority] (AFMA) has lifted the fishery quotas,''
  • ''(v) public access, transparency and scrutiny of any operational compliance data, and''
  • ''(vi) the non-compliance of AFMA quota-setting processes with the [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/faa1991262/ Fisheries Administration Act 1991] (the Act); and''
  • ''(b) calls on the Government to:''
  • ''(i) reverse the decision to lift the quota for the Small Pelagic Fishery and examine the compliance of the AFMA-led process that led to this decision with the Act,''
  • ''(ii) demonstrate that it has fully examined and mitigated the impacts of localised depletion that the FV Margiris will have and ensure that a bioregional approach has been taken in setting the harvest strategy under which this ship would operate, and''
  • ''(iii) demonstrate that 100 per cent observer coverage will be achieved on-board to ensure compliance and minimal by-catch, given that the ship will operate 24 hours a day, and ensure all compliance data will be publically available.''
  • The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-08-16.28.2) introduced by Greens Senator [Peter Whish-Wilson](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Peter_Whish-Wilson&mpc=Senate&house=senate), which means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:
  • _That the Senate—_
  • _(a) notes, in regard to the introduction of the factory ship [FV Margiris](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris) to the Australian Small [Pelagic](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pelagic_fish) Fishery, the range of significant and justifiable concerns, including but not limited to:_
  • _(i) the localised depletion of fish stocks,_
  • _(ii) mammalian by-catch, including seals and dolphins,_
  • _(iii) impacts on other industries, including tourism,_
  • _(iv) the assertion that this super trawler is only economically viable because it previously received European Union subsidies and the [Australian Fisheries Management Authority](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Fisheries_Management_Authority) (AFMA) has lifted the fishery quotas,_
  • _(v) public access, transparency and scrutiny of any operational compliance data, and_
  • _(vi) the non-compliance of AFMA quota-setting processes with the [Fisheries Administration Act 1991](http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/faa1991262/) (the Act); and_
  • _(b) calls on the Government to:_
  • _(i) reverse the decision to lift the quota for the Small Pelagic Fishery and examine the compliance of the AFMA-led process that led to this decision with the Act,_
  • _(ii) demonstrate that it has fully examined and mitigated the impacts of localised depletion that the FV Margiris will have and ensure that a bioregional approach has been taken in setting the harvest strategy under which this ship would operate, and_
  • _(iii) demonstrate that 100 per cent observer coverage will be achieved on-board to ensure compliance and minimal by-catch, given that the ship will operate 24 hours a day, and ensure all compliance data will be publically available._
senate vote 2012-08-16#1

Edited by mackay staff

on 2014-08-06 15:09:18

Title

  • Motions — Australian Small Pelagic Fishery
  • Motions — Australian Small Pelagic Fishery - Reverse decision to lift quota

Description

  • <p class="speaker">Peter Whish-Wilson</p>
  • <p>I move:</p>
  • <p class="italic">That the Senate&#8212;</p>
  • The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-08-16.28.2 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Peter_Whish-Wilson&mpc=Senate&house=senate Peter Whish-Wilson], which means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:
  • ''That the Senate—''
  • ''(a) notes, in regard to the introduction of the factory ship [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris] to the Australian Small [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pelagic_fish Pelagic] Fishery, the range of significant and justifiable concerns, including but not limited to:''
  • ''(i) the localised depletion of fish stocks,''
  • ''(ii) mammalian by-catch, including seals and dolphins,''
  • ''(iii) impacts on other industries, including tourism,''
  • ''(iv) the assertion that this super trawler is only economically viable because it previously received European Union subsidies and the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Fisheries_Management_Authority Australian Fisheries Management Authority] (AFMA) has lifted the fishery quotas,''
  • ''(v) public access, transparency and scrutiny of any operational compliance data, and''
  • ''(vi) the non-compliance of AFMA quota-setting processes with the [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/faa1991262/ Fisheries Administration Act 1991] (the Act); and''
  • ''(b) calls on the Government to:''
  • ''(i) reverse the decision to lift the quota for the Small Pelagic Fishery and examine the compliance of the AFMA-led process that led to this decision with the Act,''
  • ''(ii) demonstrate that it has fully examined and mitigated the impacts of localised depletion that the FV Margiris will have and ensure that a bioregional approach has been taken in setting the harvest strategy under which this ship would operate, and''
  • ''(iii) demonstrate that 100 per cent observer coverage will be achieved on-board to ensure compliance and minimal by-catch, given that the ship will operate 24 hours a day, and ensure all compliance data will be publically available.''
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(a)&#160;&#160;&#160;notes, in regard to the introduction of the factory ship FV <i>Margiris</i> to the Australian Small Pelagic Fishery, the range of significant and justifiable concerns, including but not limited to:</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;(i)&#160;&#160;&#160;the localised depletion of fish stocks,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;(ii)&#160;&#160;&#160;mammalian by-catch, including seals and dolphins,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;(iii)&#160;&#160;&#160;impacts on other industries, including tourism,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;(iv)&#160;&#160;&#160;the assertion that this super trawler is only economically viable because it previously received European Union subsidies and the Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) has lifted the fishery quotas,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;(v)&#160;&#160;&#160;public access, transparency and scrutiny of any operational compliance data, and</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;(vi)&#160;&#160;&#160;the non-compliance of AFMA quota-setting processes with the <i>Fisheries Administration Act 1991</i> (the Act); and</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(b)&#160;&#160;&#160;calls on the Government to:</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;(i)&#160;&#160;&#160;reverse the decision to lift the quota for the Small Pelagic Fishery and examine the compliance of the AFMA-led process that led to this decision with the Act,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;(ii)&#160;&#160;&#160;demonstrate that it has fully examined and mitigated the impacts of localised depletion that the FV <i>Margiris</i> will have and ensure that a bioregional approach has been taken in setting the harvest strategy under which this ship would operate, and</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;(iii)&#160;&#160;&#160;demonstrate that 100 per cent observer coverage will be achieved on-board to ensure compliance and minimal by-catch, given that the ship will operate 24 hours a day, and ensure all compliance data will be publically available.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">John Hogg</p>
  • <p>The question is that the motion moved by Senator Whish-Wilson be agreed to.</p>