All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2012-03-19#6
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:20:47
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2012-03-19.127.1 motion] moved by Liberal Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Mathias_Cormann&mpc=Senate&house=senate Mathias Cormann] that:''...so much of standing order 142 be suspended as would prevent further consideration of the bill without limitation of time.''(To learn more about standing orders, see this [http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html Fact Sheet].
)This means that the majority were in favour of limiting the time available to debate the introduction of the Minerals Resource Rent Tax.(To learn more about the Minerals Resource Rent Tax see the Australian Tax Office's [http://www.ato.gov.au/Business/Minerals-resource-rent-tax/ website] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minerals_Resource_Rent_Tax Wikipedia].)References- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2012-03-19.127.1) moved by Liberal Senator [Mathias Cormann](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Mathias_Cormann&mpc=Senate&house=senate) that:
- _...so much of standing order 142 be suspended as would prevent further consideration of the bill without limitation of time._(To learn more about standing orders, see this [Fact Sheet](http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html). )
- This means that the majority were in favour of limiting the time available to debate the introduction of the Minerals Resource Rent Tax.(To learn more about the Minerals Resource Rent Tax see the Australian Tax Office's [website](http://www.ato.gov.au/Business/Minerals-resource-rent-tax/) and [Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minerals_Resource_Rent_Tax).)
- References
|
|
senate vote 2012-03-19#6
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:16:50
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2012-03-19.127.1 motion] moved by Liberal Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Mathias_Cormann&mpc=Senate&house=senate Mathias Cormann] that:
''...so much of standing order 142 be suspended as would prevent further consideration of the bill without limitation of time.''[1]- ''...so much of standing order 142 be suspended as would prevent further consideration of the bill without limitation of time.''(To learn more about standing orders, see this [http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html Fact Sheet].
)
This means that the majority were in favour of limiting the time available to debate the introduction of the Minerals Resource Rent Tax.[2]- This means that the majority were in favour of limiting the time available to debate the introduction of the Minerals Resource Rent Tax.(To learn more about the Minerals Resource Rent Tax see the Australian Tax Office's [http://www.ato.gov.au/Business/Minerals-resource-rent-tax/ website] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minerals_Resource_Rent_Tax Wikipedia].)
- References
* [1] To learn more about standing orders, see this [http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html Fact Sheet].* [2] To learn more about the Minerals Resource Rent Tax see the Australian Tax Office's [http://www.ato.gov.au/Business/Minerals-resource-rent-tax/ website] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minerals_Resource_Rent_Tax Wikipedia].
|
|
senate vote 2012-03-19#6
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-01-03 17:55:21
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2012-03-19.127.1 motion] moved by Liberal Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Mathias_Cormann&mpc=Senate&house=senate Mathias Cormann] that:
- ''...so much of standing order 142 be suspended as would prevent further consideration of the bill without limitation of time.''[1]
This means that the majority were in favour of limiting the length of the debate.[2]- This means that the majority were in favour of limiting the time available to debate the introduction of the Minerals Resource Rent Tax.[2]
- References
- * [1] To learn more about standing orders, see this [http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html Fact Sheet].
* [2] To read Senator Brown's comments see the [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2012-03-19.123.10 Senate debate].- * [2] To learn more about the Minerals Resource Rent Tax see the Australian Tax Office's [http://www.ato.gov.au/Business/Minerals-resource-rent-tax/ website] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minerals_Resource_Rent_Tax Wikipedia].
|
|
senate vote 2012-03-19#6
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-01-03 17:51:45
|
Title
Bills — Minerals Resource Rent Tax Bill 2011, Minerals Resource Rent Tax (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2011, Minerals Resource Rent Tax (Imposition — General) Bill 2011, Minerals Resource Rent Tax (Imposition — Customs) Bill 2011, Minerals Resource Rent Tax (Imposition — Excise) Bill 2011, Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Assessment Amendment Bill 2011, Petroleum Resource Rent Tax (Imposition — General) Bill 2011, Petroleum Resource Rent Tax (Imposition — Customs) Bill 2011, Petroleum Resource Rent Tax (Imposition — Excise) Bill 2011, Tax Laws Amendment (Stronger, Fairer, Simpler and Other Measures) Bill 2011, Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Amendment Bill 2011; Second Reading- Minerals Resource Rent Tax Bill 2011 and related bills - Second Reading - Motion to continue debating
Description
<p class="speaker">John Hogg</p><p>The question now is that the motion moved by Senator Cormann be agreed to.</p> - The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2012-03-19.127.1 motion] moved by Liberal Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Mathias_Cormann&mpc=Senate&house=senate Mathias Cormann] that:
- ''...so much of standing order 142 be suspended as would prevent further consideration of the bill without limitation of time.''[1]
- This means that the majority were in favour of limiting the length of the debate.[2]
- References
- * [1] To learn more about standing orders, see this [http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/standing_orders.html Fact Sheet].
- * [2] To read Senator Brown's comments see the [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2012-03-19.123.10 Senate debate].
|