|
senate vote 2012-03-14#4
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2018-05-18 16:54:38
|
Title
Motions — Convention on the Rights of the Child- Motions - Convention on the Rights of the Child - Sign Third Optional Protocol
Description
<p class="speaker">Sarah Hanson-Young</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the Senate—</p>- The majority voted against a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2012-03-14.100.1) introduced by Greens Senator for SA [Sarah Hanson-Young](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/sa/sarah_hanson-young), which means it was rejected.
- ### Motion text
- > *That the Senate—*
- > *(a) notes:*
- >> *(i) the launch of the Third Optional Protocol on the [Convention on the Rights of the Child](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_the_Rights_of_the_Child), which proposes four procedures for children, young people, and their advocates to report a violation of child rights directly to the Committee on the Rights of the Child,*
- >> *(ii) that the Third Optional Protocol opened for signature on 28 February 2012 and was signed on that day by countries, including Austria, Belgium, Chile, Costa Rica, Finland, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Maldives, Mali, Montenegro, Morocco, Peru, Portugal, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Uruguay; and*
- >> *(iii) the Third Optional Protocol offers a crucial opportunity to strengthen mechanisms for equality and justice for all children and young people in Australia; and*
- > *(b) calls on the Government to ensure that Australia signs on to the Third Optional Protocol on the Convention on the Rights of the Child without delay.*
<p class="italic">  (a)   notes:</p><p class="italic">     (i)   the launch of the Third Optional Protocol on the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which proposes four procedures for children, young people, and their advocates to report a violation of child rights directly to the Committee on the Rights of the Child,</p><p class="italic">     (ii)   that the Third Optional Protocol opened for signature on 28 February 2012 and was signed on that day by countries, including Austria, Belgium, Chile, Costa Rica, Finland, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Maldives, Mali, Montenegro, Morocco, Peru, Portugal, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Uruguay; and</p><p class="italic">     (iii)   the Third Optional Protocol offers a crucial opportunity to strengthen mechanisms for equality and justice for all children and young people in Australia; and</p><p class="italic">  (b)   calls on the Government to ensure that Australia signs on to the Third Optional Protocol on the Convention on the Rights of the Child without delay.</p> <p class="speaker">Jacinta Collins</p><p>I seek leave to make a brief statement.</p> <p class="speaker">Stephen Parry</p><p>Leave is granted for two minutes.</p> <p class="speaker">Jacinta Collins</p><p>The government welcomes any discussion about furthering the promotion and protection of children's rights. The Attorney-General's Department is conducting a consultation to this effect. No decision has yet been made as to whether Australia may become a party to the optional protocol and Australia has not made any statement regarding refusal to sign. It would be premature to announce an intention to become a party to the optional protocol without undertaking appropriate consultation processes, as we are currently doing.</p> <p class="speaker">Sarah Hanson-Young</p><p>I seek to make a brief statement.</p> <p class="speaker">Stephen Parry</p><p>Leave is granted for two minutes.</p> <p class="speaker">Sarah Hanson-Young</p><p>I am disappointed that the government have not signed the optional protocol as yet. There seems to be no excuse as to why not. I would hope that in their discussions they are indeed speaking with the very children whose rights are being violated. They, of course, are the 500 or so children who remain under the legal guardianship of the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Chris Bowen. If this protocol were to be signed, they would be able to complain directly to the UN and have them investigate whether the immigration minister is indeed upholding his duty of care to the very same people for whom he is both the jailer and the legal guardian.</p> <p class="speaker">Stephen Parry</p><p>The question is that the motion moved by Senator Hanson-Young be agreed to.</p>
|